- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Mitth'ras'safis
- Nominated by: --Dionne Jinn (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I just want the bragging rights for getting both his Legends as well as his Canon version up to FA status!
- WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Chiss, WP:NOVELS
(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)
Support
Object
Samonic
"idea to sent Thrawn into exile, while the Senior Captain..." came up with the idea to sent Thrawn into exile should be "came up with the idea to send Thrawn into exile" There are various of this type of errors in the Legacy section.- Did I get them all?--Dionne Jinn (talk) 16:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
When Mitth'ras'safis's death is mentioned. Was it indeed confirmed that he died? I thought he was presumed dead. Samonic
(Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 14:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)- Sorry if this is a spoiler, but for us readers: yes, he is pretty clearly going to die at the end of his last Memories section. What comes to the Chiss society, he is most likely declared dead after he failed to return within a year after his disappearance.--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Not a spoiler considering I was very aware of his death, anything else is spoilers, his death is not. Alright, thank you. (Then some pages have wrong information, thank you) Samonic (Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 20:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry if this is a spoiler, but for us readers: yes, he is pretty clearly going to die at the end of his last Memories section. What comes to the Chiss society, he is most likely declared dead after he failed to return within a year after his disappearance.--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Can "Personality and traits" be expanded to include Thrass' relationships (Maybe in a subsection, not necessary if the length doesn't permit a subsection) with Thrawn and other individuals? (Such as Mitth'oor'aki'ord)
- I'm not sure that is necessary. But I'll think about it a little more (so don't strike this objection just yet). I would also like to hear other reviewers opinions about this topic.--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- There is certainly precedent for including relationships - sometimes as a subsection - in the PT if there's enough material to warrant it. 1358 (Talk) 17:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- The relationships section is extremely rare in FAs, actually. (Just for fun, I actually counted them. Canon 0/32, Legends 6/all named character articles). So, no, it cannot be actually counted as a valid objection for stopping any FA nomination to pass. Which still doesn't mean I won't consider adding it to this one. It would be fun to have an exception…--Dionne Jinn (talk) 07:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- "It cannot be actually counted as a valid objection for stopping any FA nomination to pass" It's not stopping the FA from passing? — Samonic 11:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- "It cannot be actually counted as a valid objection for stopping any FA nomination to pass" It's not stopping the FA from passing? — Samonic
- The relationships section is extremely rare in FAs, actually. (Just for fun, I actually counted them. Canon 0/32, Legends 6/all named character articles). So, no, it cannot be actually counted as a valid objection for stopping any FA nomination to pass. Which still doesn't mean I won't consider adding it to this one. It would be fun to have an exception…--Dionne Jinn (talk) 07:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think a relationships section could be useful, even if not necessary per policy. I'd say give it a shot and let's see how it looks! MasterFred
(talk) (he/him) 17:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is certainly precedent for including relationships - sometimes as a subsection - in the PT if there's enough material to warrant it. 1358 (Talk) 17:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- This objection remains unfixed as of today. Please address or contest it as soon as possible. 1358 (Talk) 07:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that is necessary. But I'll think about it a little more (so don't strike this objection just yet). I would also like to hear other reviewers opinions about this topic.--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Can more images be added? I'm sure there's some to add, maybe the Chiss Ascendancy logo? It's almost a 8000 words-long article with only 4 images. Samonic (Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 16:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)- Added Mitth and Ascendancy symbols (and messed the left/right placements like a noob!). The problem is that there are not too many to choose from. (Honestly, I would love to stick Ar'alani somewhere, but we don't even have evidence they met in Canon).--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Looks nice. There are many images of Thrawn, maybe that'd be used, but I think it has the right amount of images now. (Did they meet in Legends at all?) Samonic (Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 21:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, there are more Thrawn images, but most of them are from the time when Thrass was already dead, and I have hard time figuring out rationale to put them into the article. And yes, Ar'alani and Thrass worked together in Legends during its version of "Vagaari operations", which is partly why I'm tempted to make a leap of logic and stick her image here. Now that I think of it, I could add one more picture, of Legends version of Outbound Flight to the behind the scenes section. Yes, I'll do that…--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Looks nice. There are many images of Thrawn, maybe that'd be used, but I think it has the right amount of images now. (Did they meet in Legends at all?) Samonic
- Added Mitth and Ascendancy symbols (and messed the left/right placements like a noob!). The problem is that there are not too many to choose from. (Honestly, I would love to stick Ar'alani somewhere, but we don't even have evidence they met in Canon).--Dionne Jinn (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- There are many sections with several paragraphs, such as "Claim of brotherhood," smaller paragraphs can be merged, and subsections should be created.
- Shouldn't core names be included? You refer to their core names after introducing their full names, however, you do not establish them being their core names. (Example: Mitth'ali'astov)
- Could you establish that ozyly-esehembo was the Cheunh word for sky-walker? As well as who created the idea to make Thrawn be brought up on charges? (His last stand) — Samonic 08:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Could you also establish what Outbound Flight was in "Behind the scenes"?
- Would you be against changing the quote of the "Death" section to one of the conversation between Unidentified human female (Lesser Space)
Lorana Jinzlerand Thrass? - Full release date for Thrawn Ascendancy: Greater Good is unnecessary. That will be all from me, very well done.— Samonic 09:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
spookly
Context for Csilla, Avidich, Rentor, Naporar, Minnisiat, Meese Caulf, Garwians, Ool, and Uingali foar Marocsaa.—spookywillowwtalk 19:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- That about enough?--Dionne Jinn (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
ThrawnChiss7
- You should have Unidentified Chaf task force created and mentioned in the section about the Vaagari pirate operation -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry to interject, but the page has been created.— Samonic 09:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- It still needs to be linked. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, of course.— Samonic 14:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, of course.— Samonic
- It still needs to be linked. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry to interject, but the page has been created.— Samonic
Comments
Reviewing note. Continue reading the biography once I finish Lesser Evil.(Early life) Samonic (Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 14:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Vote to remove nomination (Inq only)
- Samonic's relationships objection from March 2 has been uncontested since April 9, and additionally there are a bunch of new objections that are now 14 days old. Furthermore, nominator has not edited in the past month. 1358 (Talk) 10:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Imperators II(Talk) 10:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- OOM 224 10:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
