Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Mima II

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Mima II

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 22:10, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I did not, in fact, expect writing a FAN on a tropical-tectonical hellhole inhabited by furless hive-minded teddy-bears.

(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Inqvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 07:45, March 3, 2020 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:17, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:20, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
  4. Great work. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 11:29, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
  5. —spookywillowwtalk 15:20, April 15, 2020 (UTC)
  6. 01miki10 Open comlink 18:49, April 15, 2020 (UTC)
  7. Fan26 (Talk) 18:51, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Anil
  • Can the entire first paragraph of the "A world rich in life" section be sourced to the second edition of Galaxy Guide 4: Alien Races? If so, I believe ref #7 would be redundant there. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk)
    • No, specifically the part about the organic molecules can only be sourced to the first edition, hence I've elected to just source the entire sentence to that edition. Imperators II(Talk) 07:38, March 3, 2020 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Is there no article to link to for this struggle? "...an individual affiliated with one of the sides in the ongoing struggle between the Galactic Republic and the reconstituted Sith Empire..."
    • The range of dates noted in the ref note sees the end of the Cold War and the beginning of the Galactic War, hence I've elected not to link to any one of them. Besides, since by this point there are already four known consecutive periods of conflict between the Republic and the TOR Empire, IMHO it's not exactly wrong to call it all one big struggle between the two. Imperators II(Talk) 06:53, April 8, 2020 (UTC)
  • The second instance of 3643 BBY needs to employ the same date ref. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:11, April 7, 2020 (UTC)
Tommy
  • For placing Bespin in the outer rim you use the TEA ref: "The Essential Atlas — Based on corresponding data for Lar system". While this is fine for the stuff actually relating to the Lar system, I think having the same ref for something unrelated to that system is a little misleading. How would you feel about having a separate ref just for Bespin, just citing TEA on its own?
  • Can we date the Obo Rin stuff in the history section to the Imperial Period? If that can be added, I think that sentence may need to be split as a run-on. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 22:24, April 12, 2020 (UTC)
    • I refuse to explicitly reference that period in an article until someone actually sources its end date (Warfare establishes 19 BBY-17 BBY to be its first years). Besides, that paragraph mentions the Empire anyway. I have, however, split the sentence up. Imperators II(Talk) 07:56, April 13, 2020 (UTC)
      • Okay cool, I'm not gonna stand against that reasoning. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:20, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 18:53, April 15, 2020 (UTC)