- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
M'Kae
- Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:05, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Longest FAN yet.
(3 Inqs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
- After IRC review. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 05:06, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, and drugs are bad. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 06:02, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 22:37, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Protectorate (talk) 23:04, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 01:45, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
Cade Calrayn 18:42, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Byzantinefire (talk) 22:42, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 23:28, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Cav
Okay, I get that there are two different ways to play this mission depending on which alignment the character is. But, why is the article assuming 100% completion for an Imperial player? As far as I'm aware, we've only decided on following 100% dark side/Imperial completions by alignment for TOR quests, and not Galaxies. Under the current policy, should we not be assuming that the light side/Rebel completion is the most "canon"? Especially as the mission has a clear light side outcome and quest line.- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 09:04, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Changed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:56, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
First paragraph of biography is now unreffed.- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 21:13, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
- How do I make the most ridiculous errors ever? Fixed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:37, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
Cadeth
"Upon being bribed, M'Kae told the spacer about Cal Handro's last trip to show a new pilot his route to the planet Kashyyyk, and would, in exchange for his life, tell the Empire all he knew about the Alliance. This ultimately culminated in a skirmish above Naboo between the spacer and Cal Handro's escort, which ended when the spacer successfully destroyed the Warlord Heavy Cruiser occupied by Handro." What? That first sentence seems wrong, and I'm not exactly sure what the second has to do with the first. CadeCalrayn 23:05, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Hopefully clarified things. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:58, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
- I also created the Unidentified rookie pilot article, feeling that the "new pilot" is relevant enough to get one. Any disagreements or other suggestions for the name? There aren't other articles for unidentified rookie pilots, and I also avoided any stuff mentioning Cal Handro in the article name, as that gameplay scenario might have never even taken place without the player performing the quest. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:38, December 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Hopefully clarified things. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:58, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- For WP:AMB, WP:VG and WP:SWG. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:05, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Note the conflicting canon depending on the player's allegiance, with either M'Kae or Wolff Kalos being the one who wants Cal Handro dead depending on Rebel or Imperial character, the other being the one who saves Handro, and Handro wanted dead for double-crossing the Empire or by the Alliance. Also, I decided that M'Kae both hiring a Rebel spy and having a journal which included that should be taken as fully canon despite being part of a conflicting storyline. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:05, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Just realized that the Rebel spy was in fact also Handro, not a new character like I had initially thought. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:56, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- I wish there were more mechanics templates to explain the discrepancies. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:05, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Is the Galaxies image in the BTS because his eye colour is different? I don't think that's enough of a discrepancy to relegate that image to being non-canon; eye colours get drawn wrong all the time in comics but the mistake is tiny enough that it's never stopped us from treating the images as canonical. The Biography is a big wall of text and I recommend moving the Galaxies image there. Menkooroo (talk) 03:09, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- It was not added by myself. If you say so, I think I will move the image. And with the eye color, I've pretty much assumed that in all those cases one occasion is their true eye color, and the other occasion(s) they are wearing lenses. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:12, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 03:20, December 18, 2013 (UTC)