- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Reduxed Featured article. The result of the discussion was Featured article status kept. Please do not modify the page.
Contents
Lotho Minor (Redux review)
- Redux comments: Reduxed per Meeting 135.
- Date added: March 4, 2022
(+4) (Inquisitorius votes only)
Support
JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
OOM 224 20:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 00:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Object
UberSoldat
Firstly, please finish the pending updates.UberSoldat93(talk) 01:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Completed. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm checking if Anil is fine with the edits before striking. UberSoldat93
(talk) 03:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Some more details were added from the new sources, which I have reviewed now. UberSoldat93
(talk) 03:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Some more details were added from the new sources, which I have reviewed now. UberSoldat93
- I'm checking if Anil is fine with the edits before striking. UberSoldat93
- Completed. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
No need to list the locations within a point of interest in the infobox (i.e. Ruen's workshop), it works like a hierarchy.The second paragraph of "Galactic dumping ground" can use another image, suggestions include Jawas or Cymoon 1.Wreck Belt should be documented under Locations instead of Description, since it's not a naturally-occurring formation.I do think Slingshot and Dizzy's encounter is historical information and therefore should go into History.Traveler's Guide to Batuu is an in-universe publication, so the mention of the planet needs to be documented here.Full release date needed for Return to Vader's Castle issue and "Hoth and Other Outer Rim Planets."UberSoldat93(talk) 09:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- All addressed. About the objection for adding another image, I've made a slight change in one or two images' location to add a new one that is more relevant to Lotho Minor. Please take a look and let me know what you think.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- All addressed. About the objection for adding another image, I've made a slight change in one or two images' location to add a new one that is more relevant to Lotho Minor. Please take a look and let me know what you think.
Please let me know if you are satisfied with these changes.UberSoldat93(talk) 08:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed with Anil via Discord. UberSoldat93
(talk) 16:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed with Anil via Discord. UberSoldat93
Imp
Awww yeaaahh infobox-exclusive infoImperators II(Talk) 19:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)- What the heck were they doing in the infobox in the first place, eh? JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 22:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The BTS bit about Hunters doesn't make it immediately clear as to which of the two characters mentioned there is "the droideka". And that first sentence kind of smacks like a simple reiteration of the fact that the game has IU info relevant to Lotho Minor. It isn't strictly necessary for introducing the fact that the planet's name was a part of the cosmetics.In order to reduce the unsightly clunkiness of the two short paragraphs at the end of the BTS, I believe they both could be moved further up in the section. The Legends bit feels like it can be moved to before the discussion about the Star Wars Adventures comic, and the Hunters bit would work immediately after it. That way we could have three meaty paragraphs on 1) the subject's portrayal "milestones", 2) info on further Canon depictions, and 3) contradictions.Speaking of contradictions, what is the reason for treating the BMF issue as correct over the Encyclopedia one? I thought the general idea behind BMF was that in the case of any contradictions we defer to sources that are unambiguously Canon. If there are in fact other sources that reinforce BMF's claim, those should then be noted.Imperators II(Talk) 10:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)- Addressed the objections above. About the last one, I couldn't find another source that clarifies the amount of visitors to the planet, so changed the article to support the Encyclopedia's claim instead.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Addressed the objections above. About the last one, I couldn't find another source that clarifies the amount of visitors to the planet, so changed the article to support the Encyclopedia's claim instead.
OOM
"offering a great sum of credits for the capture of himself in hopes of luring a starship that he could escape in" — this is repeated word-for-word between the intro and the body, so it'd be great if the wording is changed.Similarly, "also" is used four times in one of the "Inhabitants" section's paragraphs.There's an apparant inconsistency between the Junkers being established as a species and them consisting of various species.OOM 224 21:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)- All addressed.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- All addressed.
Fred strikes back
Eloc Throno's mention of the planet should be moved down to the end of the "History" section, since we know the book was released in 34-35 ABY.MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 00:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Addressed.
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Addressed.