Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Dark Apprentice (clone)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Dark Apprentice

• Nominated by: GTQ 03:10, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

• Nomination comments:

Sourced and has all sections

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Nayayen

• On a very quick glance, any source for his height? NAYAYEN^{—it appears to be a frammistat} 14:39, December 18, 2010 (UTC)

Moffship

• Aside from the fact that I wrote the majority of this article and planned to finish it sometime in the future, I have serious doubts about you being able to handle this FA nom. You've made one edit to the article - and that was to add the {{FAnom}} template. Your recent nomination history (and by that, I mean Orbit, which has been removed by the AgriCorps) is not giving me much hope either. I suggest you actually put time and effort into writing an article before deciding to nominate it on a whim. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 16:45, December 18, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• You need to add this to Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations, by placing {{/Dark Apprentice (clone)}} at the bottom of the list. It may be a few weeks before anyone addresses the nomination, but as is, nobody can even tell that it's nominated. SinisterSamurai 18:26, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
• I would like to see some proof from the nominator that he is up to fix any incoming objections, considering he hasn't edited this particular article other than slapping the nom template. –Tm_T ^(Talk) 07:59, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • I would like to note that, actually, Grand Moff Tranner seems to have written most of this article (the edit history shows his edits adding to page size significantly as well adding {{Inuse}} tags and the like). While this doesn't stop GTQ from nominating it by any means, it is probably worth mentioning. NAYAYEN^{—it appears to be a frammistat} 14:38, December 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hold on i removed this nomination GTQ

• Correct me if I'm wrong but, as the nominator has requested the removal, isn't an INQ vote not needed? NAYAYEN^{—it appears to be a frammistat} 10:53, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • You're not wrong. I'll kill it. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 10:58, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (Inq only)

1. Nominator has stated above his intentions to remove this nomination. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 14:58, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
2. CC7567 ^(talk) 04:52, December 24, 2010 (UTC)