Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Courageous (Inexpugnable-class)

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Courageous (Inexpugnable-class)

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 05:50, September 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The echo of a distant tide comes willowing across the sand, and everything is green and submarine.

(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 01:03, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:41, November 2, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:06, December 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Emperor Jarjarkine MP-Mandalorian Senate Hall 01:37, December 17, 2014 (UTC) amazing page :)
  5. Inqvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:11, December 19, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 06:47, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Exiled Jedi
  • In the Campaign Guide, the statistics for the command ship say how many gunners were used for each battery. If you multiply it out, you can see how many gunners the ship had. Page 170 of the Saga Edition Core Rulebook makes it clear that each weapon battery has a number of guns equal to the number of gunners. Please mention this information.
  • Just checking, but can the 3963 BBY date be sourced directly to the comic book?
  • As a note, I just wanted to let you know that I linked Merit Board since you had it capitalized. If this is just a generic term, you can remove the link.
  • Also, meter is a New Canon article.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 04:48, November 2, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I presume it has an engine, in which case I think the "engine" infobox field should specify "Equipped."
  • Judging from the article, it seems the escape pod field should also be populated.
  • This is one of those little spelling oddities that we deal with in our articles, but "crewmember" is not a word. The only reason we should treat it was one is if a source actually uses it as a single word. "The display could be disorienting to crewmembers"
  • The article doesn't need to repeat the crew information in both the Description and Commanders and crew. Just cut the mention from Description.
  • I would suggest just cutting out the end of the BTS after the Courageux sentence. It's not saying anything substantive and is just regurgitating the Appearances/Sources.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:29, December 18, 2014 (UTC)

Comments