- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Cormun (Imperial Army)
- Nominated by: Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 01:45, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Was going for GAN, but I ended up with 1,281 words. WP:TOR fun!
(5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Plagueis327 03:23, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 20:51, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:14, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
CC7567 (talk) 00:45, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Menkooroo (talk) 21:57, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 22:47, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Object
Trayus
Because the date 3641 BBY is never provided in-game and that specific dating system does not come from the game itself, you'll need an independent reference. Check out the note here and in other game-era articles. Best practice would be to use a citation such as that when sourcing anything to the 3643 BBY date. If you can do what you can to ensure any of your other TOR articles reflect this as well, it would be much appreciated.Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 20:18, June 25, 2012 (UTC)- So do you want me to use 3643 BBY or 3641 BBY? I'm not sure which you intended.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 23:55, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Either way works. Erickson said ten to twelve years, so as long as you use "around" or "approximately," either is roughly correct. Just be sure to pick one and source it. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 02:49, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
- On this nomination, Menk has suggested that we used the range of dates 3643 BBY to 3641 BBY. If this is the way we decide to go, how would I handle articles like Zirchros that have a date that uses the game's date. Figured it would be best to iron everything out before making changes.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 01:53, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
- I fixed Cormun, sometime later today I will fix the rest of my articles.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 12:47, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
- I fixed Cormun, sometime later today I will fix the rest of my articles.--Exiled Jedi
- On this nomination, Menk has suggested that we used the range of dates 3643 BBY to 3641 BBY. If this is the way we decide to go, how would I handle articles like Zirchros that have a date that uses the game's date. Figured it would be best to iron everything out before making changes.--Exiled Jedi
- Either way works. Erickson said ten to twelve years, so as long as you use "around" or "approximately," either is roughly correct. Just be sure to pick one and source it. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 02:49, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
- So do you want me to use 3643 BBY or 3641 BBY? I'm not sure which you intended.--Exiled Jedi
Cav
Naming: shouldn't the article be at "Cormun (Human)" rather than "Corman (Imperial Army)"? I think species as a descriptor is preferred over affiliation if known.- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 19:17, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Well we have the GAs Sapphire (smuggler) and Taggart (Senate Guard) and the FAs Mist (bounty hunter) and Hoth (Jedi Lord) who are all confirmed Humans without the other disambig articles being identified as Humans. While many were identified by their species I couldn't really see that there was any precedent either way. If you still want it changed I will move the article.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 23:51, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Well, seeing as I wrote one of those, I withdraw the objection :P - Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 20:51, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Well, seeing as I wrote one of those, I withdraw the objection :P - Cavalier One
- Well we have the GAs Sapphire (smuggler) and Taggart (Senate Guard) and the FAs Mist (bounty hunter) and Hoth (Jedi Lord) who are all confirmed Humans without the other disambig articles being identified as Humans. While many were identified by their species I couldn't really see that there was any precedent either way. If you still want it changed I will move the article.--Exiled Jedi
Attack of the Clone
Please go through and double-check the article for linking to make sure that everything is linked where it needs to be. I'll review the rest of the article once this is done.CC7567 (talk) 23:49, August 2, 2012 (UTC)- I went through it a couple of times and I think I found everything I missed.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 00:13, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- I went through it a couple of times and I think I found everything I missed.--Exiled Jedi
{{Fact}} tag in the body. Please make sure not to forget refs next time.CC7567 (talk) 00:22, August 3, 2012 (UTC)- Fixed.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 00:41, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed.--Exiled Jedi
Egg sacs
There's a bit of repetition in the intro: A sentence begins with "After losing these troops," and the following sentence leads off with "After the slaughter of his troops," --- maybe jettison one of them? Not really necessary to say the same thing twice, especially in the intro.- Removed.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 21:36, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Removed.--Exiled Jedi
Ref [1] appears twice in a row at the beginning of the bio --- is one of them supposed to be something else?- Just a duplicate, fixed--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 21:36, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Just a duplicate, fixed--Exiled Jedi
The opening of the second paragraph of the bio kind of repeats itself, too: The first sentence says that they took heavy casualties, and the second sentence says that they retreated. The third and fourth sentences go on to say the same thing, but with a little bit of new information. Is there any chance you could merge and reduce the info so as to avoid repetition?- Merged.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 21:36, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Merged.--Exiled Jedi
A bit of play-by-play in the bio: "The Sergeant explained the situation and asked for assistance," "He maintained that his troops had..." "He further told the acolyte..." Can you pare down the conversation into a summary that gets the main points across? Details like his views on his troops' competence are in the P&T and don't necessarily need to be in the bio.- Cleaned up somewhat.--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 21:36, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Cleaned up somewhat.--Exiled Jedi
Is the item that the player receives for completing the quest different every time? If not, can you state what the item is; if so, can you call it "randomly-selected" or something?Menkooroo (talk) 18:15, August 3, 2012 (UTC)- Added items, should I create articles for these?--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 21:36, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Added items, should I create articles for these?--Exiled Jedi
Comments
- Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 22:47, August 3, 2012 (UTC)