Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Bulwark Mark III

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Bulwark Mark III
    • 1.1 (4 Inqs/4 Users/8 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Savaged…
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Bulwark Mark III

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:44, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A rare FAN from Toprawa. Went over 1000 with Warfare update.

(4 Inqs/4 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote JangFett (Talk) 16:16, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Clean.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:15, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:09, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
    • I need to get use to seeing a non Inq vote from you :( JangFett (Talk) 17:10, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Plagueis327 (talk) 05:55, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:20, December 25, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:14, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote CC7567 (talk) 19:41, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
  8. ~SavageBOB sig 05:43, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Savaged…
  • The distribution of its turbolasers and ion cannons is currently infobox exclusive. Tis all. ~SavageBOB sig 13:07, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review, Bob. Just leaving a note to say that I'm not intentionally neglecting this, just haven't gotten around to it yet. :P Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:58, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ok, worked them in. How's that work for you?
    • Also, regarding your review, I wanted to suggest changing "more" back to "most" in those two places, only because those two sources (Star Wars: Rebellion and CSWE) both describe the Bulwark as "one of the most" armored/durable vessels of the Rebel Fleet. I feel like there's a slight change in meaning otherwise. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:31, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
      • The OS is technically grammatically incorrect, then! The rule is that there can only be one thing that is the most of something, so the phrase "one of the most" is inherently incorrect. It's pretty much become standard English nowadays, and only a few stalwarts such as myself are resisting it, though, so I won't oppose or be offended if you want to change it back. :) ~SavageBOB sig 05:43, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 07:14, January 19, 2013 (UTC)