Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Bouncer

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Bouncer

Support

  1. --Eyrezer 13:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Darthchristian (Hey!) 16:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Nice. Chack Jadson 22:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. Cull Tremayne 05:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  5. QuentinGeorge 05:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC) - Big thumbs up from me.
  6. Jaina Solo(Talk) 19:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  7. Greyman(Paratus) 01:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  8. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  9. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 13:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  • I don't believe its ever explicitly stated that Zannah killed Darovit. QuentinGeorge 05:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
    • That's an interesting point. DFS say she "engaged her sibling [sic] in a final deadly confrontation". Final and deadly for whom? I seem to recall Abel discussing this on tfn. I'll see if I can dig it up, but will change it on this article anyway.--Eyrezer 03:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I remember this point mainly because I was the one to ask if Zannah killed Darovit, and Abel Pena told me not to assume that.... QuentinGeorge 03:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
        • Typical ambiguity!! :) --Eyrezer 03:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Jerg's article says he discovered Ruusan in 11 BBY. The Bouncer article says 5 BBY. Which is it? QuentinGeorge 05:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Jerg says to Morgan that it was about 10 years earlier. With Morgan being killed in 1 BBY, it must be at least 11 BBY. Good spotting. Now corrected. --Eyrezer 03:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Where is it stated that bouncers are the sole sentient species of Ruusan? Seems to be an assumption based on Snapit's comment. --Imperialles 14:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Dark Forces Saga specifically says that there are only three sentient species on Ruusan, Bouncers, Ruusaanian Near Humans (descended from early human colonists) and regular humans. (recent colonists). QuentinGeorge 09:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Approved by Inquisitorius - Wookieepedia:Inq/Bouncer 10:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Minor point. Is Bouncer fatalism a result of the devastation of their world by Kaan, or were they always like that? QuentinGeorge 05:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Hmm. I don't think it is clear. Like the differences noted in the behind the scenes, it could be a result of development over the next thousand years. However, Laa did appear to be resigned to her fate in her conversations with Rain, although whether her actions can be used as a basis for a generalization for the species as a whole is debatable. On balance, I'd probably attribute it to their biology rather than that particular cataclysm. That was what Grawley attributed it too at the least. --Eyrezer 03:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)