Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Baydo Chasdy

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Baydo Chasdy
    • 1.1 (5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Attack of the Clone
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Baydo Chasdy

  • Nominated by: Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:26, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 1,062 words. Be gentle.

(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 04:33, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Blarg. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 00:01, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote CC7567 (talk) 18:55, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Nice JangFett (Talk) 02:58, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:01, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Attack of the Clone
  • Is the {{1st}} in the Sources section supposed to be {{1stm}}? Just wanted to check. CC7567 (talk) 07:43, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • Well, it is a sourcebook without any narrative involving Chasdy, so I guess so. Changed. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 19:38, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 12:01, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

  • There was a note deleted from the BTS about it being strange for him to be rescuing Rebels who had already found their way to Mon Calamari. I'm presuming it was too speculative? —Silly Dan (talk) 01:29, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • Well, yes and no. True, the section on Fathoms featuring Chasdy includes the information that Mon Calamari is free of Imperial control, so his "rescuing" of agents seems a little strange since any Rebel getting to Mon Calamari is presumably in safe territory. However, since the agents he recovers are implied to usually be covert operatives and spies, they may use other means of return to the Alliance to avoid being further identified by Imperial and criminal spies. I will try to re-add the information into the BTS if you feel its important enough? - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:59, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
      • I think it could be mentioned, but I'll leave it up to other reviewers. (That's why I put this under "comments", not "objections".) —Silly Dan (talk) 13:25, April 16, 2013 (UTC)