Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Battle of Sarrish/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Battle of Sarrish
    • 1.1 (4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Floyd has one thing
        • 1.1.2.2 501st
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Battle of Sarrish

  • Nominated by: CC7567 (talk) 21:50, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: WP:TCW. Part Two of CloneProject: Outer Rim Sieges. (We'll see what comes next.)

(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 23:49, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. 501st dogma(talk) 12:35, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Man, so TCW took a shit on a pre-TCW battle? JangFett (Talk) 20:51, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:56, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 14:49, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Jinzler (talk) 18:34, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Floyd has one thing
  • "Thanks to Gregor's sacrifice," His sacrifice? What sacrifice? IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 00:59, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • Changed to "efforts" to avoid having to go into too much detail about the episode. Thanks for the review. CC7567 (talk) 23:58, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
501st
  • Shouldn't the Battle of Duro be in the previous section of the infobox?
    • The bit about the Battle of Sarrish following Duro comes from this page of the Atlas, which only provides the Republic fleet movement as the connection between the two battles, not any sort of direct timeline chronology. I wish it were otherwise, but as far as I know we're not going to get any sort of new Clone Wars timeline in the foreseeable future (someone on Facebook asked Leland Chee). CC7567 (talk) 09:03, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • The infobox has 20 BBY sourced to 3, while the body has it reffed to 2. Fix please.
    • Well, technically, all of those first two sentences of the Prelude chronicle information that comes directly from the Atlas, without a direct reference to Sarrish (which is introduced a bit farther down in the Prelude). Ref note 3 is used again in the Bts regarding the date problem. CC7567 (talk) 09:03, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • Otherwise, looks good. 501st dogma(talk) 16:52, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. CC7567 (talk) 09:03, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 20:47, August 14, 2013 (UTC)