- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Attack on an Imperial convoy
- Nominated by: Brandon Rhea(talk) 07:39, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: something something something wit - Brandon Rhea(talk) 07:39, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)
Support
- Coruscantfan (Talk) 22:14, June 25, 2015 (UTC)
- - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:14, June 25, 2015 (UTC)
Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:54, September 18, 2015 (UTC)
Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:06, September 22, 2015 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Talk) 03:12, October 8, 2015 (UTC)- <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:14, October 8, 2015 (UTC)
Cade Calrayn 03:24, October 13, 2015 (UTC)
Object
AV-6R7
Although some sources call the asteroid itself Fort Anaxes, the asteroid is actually designated PM-1203. This will need to be corrected. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:53, June 22, 2015 (UTC)- Well, there's nothing in need of correction. Everything in the article correctly states that Fort Anaxes is an asteroid base, which it is. I'll simply add in a link to PM-1203 where appropriate. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:56, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
Green Tentacle
Mandalorian needs to be linked to something in the intro and body. Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:04, August 17, 2015 (UTC)- Hey GT. I've actually responded to this objection in multiple noms before. As you can see, Mandalorian/Canon is protected from being created. The reason is that, canonically, Mandalorian is currently just a demonym. There would be no difference between content in Mandalorian/Canon and Mandalore—unlike, say, Alderaanian vs Alderaan. So we won't be creating Mandalorian/Canon at this time. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 15:11, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
- In which case it should at least link to Mandalore. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:06, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
- I have been told on multiple instances not to do that, so I haven't done it on any previous noms. I would like a firm answer on this before I add it to this nom, that way it can be consistent with other articles. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:09, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Can I get an update here? I'm inclined to go with existing precedent for this, so unless something changes, can this objection be struck? - Brandon Rhea(talk) 04:12, September 18, 2015 (UTC)
- I have been told on multiple instances not to do that, so I haven't done it on any previous noms. I would like a firm answer on this before I add it to this nom, that way it can be consistent with other articles. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 16:09, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
- In which case it should at least link to Mandalore. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:06, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Hey GT. I've actually responded to this objection in multiple noms before. As you can see, Mandalorian/Canon is protected from being created. The reason is that, canonically, Mandalorian is currently just a demonym. There would be no difference between content in Mandalorian/Canon and Mandalore—unlike, say, Alderaanian vs Alderaan. So we won't be creating Mandalorian/Canon at this time. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 15:11, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
Yung Floydman
Need some context on the Ghost in both the intro and the body—I think just the make of the starship would be fine.I think it's worthy of note while you're describing the attack that the other crew did not know why they were attacking the convoy."was a member of a loose rebel collective that Senator Organa secretly championed and operated under the codename "Fulcrum."" This sentence makes it sound like Organa is Fulcrum, please rearrange.You should mention that the attack took place on Lothal in the intro.IFYLOFD (Talk) 16:08, September 26, 2015 (UTC)- All done. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 18:34, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 03:24, October 13, 2015 (UTC)