- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article that failed review. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Pius Dea Spaceport
- Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
- Date Requested: 01:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Date Archived: 18:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Object
- 52 BBY needs date note.
- No it doesn't, the spaceport is mentioned in a section that takes place between 54 BBY and 52 BBY, per the book itself. ThrawnChiss7
Assembly Cupola 15:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Great, if its between those two years, both have to be mentioned. But mentioning only one requires a note, and skirting by the technical use of both with "by year" seems lazy.—spookywillowwtalk 15:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- No it doesn't, the spaceport is mentioned in a section that takes place between 54 BBY and 52 BBY, per the book itself. ThrawnChiss7
- Per modern precedent if 'built by' = first seen, it isn't needed in the infobox. Would be more optimal to contextualize the mention from the PoV of who thought of it if it is in a PoV section of the novel as well (if it isn't, can be ignored).
- "The spaceport shared a name with..." is now something we put in the article body rather than BtS.—spookywillowwtalk 01:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- Marked for probation at 1 month unaddressed.—spookywillowwtalk 00:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Two months unaddressed.—spookywillowwtalk 00:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Lewisr (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 18:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)