Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Victory project

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Victory project

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: About time I did an FFG nom, sorry for the wait, Erebus
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Fantasy Flight Games

(4 ECs/3 Users/7 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Nice and easy. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 04:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
2. Why couldn't they capitalize "Project?" VergenceScatter (talk) 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
4. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
5. Liverpool92 14:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
6. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
7. OOM 224 20:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Object

Erebus

• Like the other Rise of the Separatists nominations (i.e. Delmaasi pirates), the BTS should mention that Rise, its first canon mention, was a supplement to FFG's Star Wars Roleplaying series. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 21:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• If we can't directly connect this project to the development of the star destroyer class I'm not certain we can claim that the Victor Initiative Project is definitely a corresponding Legends version. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I think its just a matter of how close the names are, and we know both were projects undertaken by the Republic in regards to its military. Its like Brain Invaders mentioning Mace Windu fighting on Dantooine, you can tell based on that little context its a reference to the Battle of Dantooine (Clone Wars) Editoronthewiki (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• I'd like to see a more varied use of language here. There's five instances of ", which" here OOM 224 20:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Better.
• I don't see anything in the article that indicates this was an organisation OOM 224 17:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed category Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Infobox OOM 224 19:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 20:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)