- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Unidentified Geonosian archduke
- Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Aliisdapro (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Objections handled via Discord OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 23:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)- UberSoldat93
(talk) 20:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC) - JediMasterMacaroni
(Talk) 20:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Object
UberSoldat
The note in Ref 4 is completely unnecessary. All you need to do is source the "public leader" part to Star Wars Book, while everything else can be handled by the novel.UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Like that?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
For simplicity's sake, just source 19 BBY and Mustafar's context to Galactic Atlas directly.- wouldn't that mean I need to cite Vader's role to Revenge of the Sith again? And you don't need to cite Mustafar context to atlas, its already in the film, meaning I would be restoring the section to what it was before a previously objection Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Then everything but the date can be covered by the film. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Then everything but the date can be covered by the film. UberSoldat93
- wouldn't that mean I need to cite Vader's role to Revenge of the Sith again? And you don't need to cite Mustafar context to atlas, its already in the film, meaning I would be restoring the section to what it was before a previously objection Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Is this Star Destroyer named in the novel?- No. The Executrix shows up later, but they are not confirmed to be the same Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
The last sentence of the body feels unnecessary as it doesn't involve the subject.UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Actually, how prominent is this Star Destroyer's appearance? It can probably get an article of its own.UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Talked about this is OOM, unless one wants to assume it was the Executrix, it probably doesn't deserve one. This is its one scene. It is noted to have served against CIS holdouts. Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- If it actually appears and has a bit of background info, then I see it as a redlink to be filled in. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Wilhuff Tarkin's Imperial-class Star Destroyer is now up Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- If it actually appears and has a bit of background info, then I see it as a redlink to be filled in. UberSoldat93
- Talked about this is OOM, unless one wants to assume it was the Executrix, it probably doesn't deserve one. This is its one scene. It is noted to have served against CIS holdouts. Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Macaroni
Missing male category.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed--Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
OOM
You should mention Poggle the Lesser's place as well as year of death for context.- done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Was this archduke elected or appointed? Assuming it's both, the date note should only use one of the words since one cannot deduce that he's appointed from the source saying he's elected.- No, I was using "elect" because I thought using appoint was a little too close to the actual text. I changed it to designate, does that work?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- You should stick with appoint since that's what the date note uses. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 23:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- You should stick with appoint since that's what the date note uses. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 23:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- No, I was using "elect" because I thought using appoint was a little too close to the actual text. I changed it to designate, does that work?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
A category for Geonosian archdukes can be created and added to the article.OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 22:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)- Done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
You can combine refs 2 and 3.- Done--Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
When mentioning planets (this doesn't apply to worlds), you should say "the Outer Rim planet Mustafar" instead of "the Outer Rim planet of Mustafar."OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 23:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)- Good?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- All good
- Good?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Would Tarkin's ISD warrant an article of its own?- The Executrix shows up later in the novel, so making an article for a destroyer that briefly shows up and may or may not just be that ship seems unnecessary--Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
You should provide the date, or at least the time frame, for when the conversation between Krennic and Tarkin took placeOOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)- How is that?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Fan26
The entireity of the second paragraph is one long run-on sentence.Fan26 (Talk) 17:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)- Because of commas I do not think it was actually a run on, but fixed—Editoronthewiki (talk) 12:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
If the novel and audiobook were released simultaenously, both should be id'd as a simultaenous first mention.Fan26 (Talk) 14:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 22:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)