Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Territory dispute on Mon Cala

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Territory dispute on Mon Cala
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 ThrawnChiss
        • 1.1.2.2 DFaceG
        • 1.1.2.3 Panther
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Territory dispute on Mon Cala

  • Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 10:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR, WP:NOVELS

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Fan26 (Talk) 19:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
  3. Panther436 (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
  4. D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 03:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss
  • Perhaps you could add Category:Battles of Dac? -ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola 02:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
    • It's not really a battle though, seems like just diplomacy stuff. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
      • Yet it is a conflict, and the category is also for "conflicts" at Mon Cala (Dac). -ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola 16:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
        • I know the category page says it includes conflicts, but it's still called "Battles of Dac", which this is not. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
          • There is longstanding precedent for this. Ex. Mission to Bestine IV (Twenty-First) is in [[:Category:Battles of Bestine]], Annexation of Tatooine is in Category:Battles of Tatooine. The category description, not the name is what matters. For example, a canine named bob would not go in Category:Canines despite it being a dog, because the category description says otherwise. -ThrawnChiss7 ThrawnHS Alliances Assembly Cupola 22:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
            • I'll defer to precedent then, but it's not really relevant what the category page says since that just depends on whatever the creator of the category felt like putting - ie it's not binding in any way. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
DFaceG
  • Should we assume the Jedi mentioned on the article were participants in this dispute given they had seen the other participant, or is that jumping a bit too far? - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
    • I considered it but the source doesn't make it explicit. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Panther
  • The second sentence uses 'had' a lot before its verbs which gives it a very passive voice. I suggest reworking it to be more direct and concise, for example changing 'had been' to 'was' etc. Panther436 (talk) 04:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Changed the first one, but the reason I was intentionally using "had" for the past perfect tense. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 10:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)