- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
T-S Seven
- Nominated by: NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 13:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: When I began working on this, it was labled as a vehicle. I think that's an assumption and made it the more ambigious "technology." Uncertain if that could also be an assumption, and, if so, what else to describe it as.
- Date Archived: 17:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Final word count: 166 words (0 introduction, 60 body, 106 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Resistance
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- AmazinglyCool
(talk) 16:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- BloodOfIrizi
(Syndicure) 18:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
—spookywillowwtalk 14:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)- UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Gotta love when 2 lines of dialogue lead to 4 CANs. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Object
Ziara
youre sourcing the entire first sentence to the date note :P- Literally screamed a "FUCK" irl upon reading this. x.x Fixed. NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 01:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Literally screamed a "FUCK" irl upon reading this. x.x Fixed. NBDani
the last two sentences should be merged and wrote out in a way that doesnt repeat the dialogue in the quote. rather play-by-play as it is- I had a pre-nom objection that it should have the quote written in prose. NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 01:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- i agree that it should be written in prose, but simplified + merged into a single sentence BloodOfIrizi
(Syndicure) 01:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- i agree that it should be written in prose, but simplified + merged into a single sentence BloodOfIrizi
- I had a pre-nom objection that it should have the quote written in prose. NBDani
how would you feel about mentioning the stormtroopers talking about new models in SW media as a "recurring theme" instead of going into detail about that specfic ANH instance?- I think tying this instance to the original and stating it's a recurring theme is enough. The original instance (VT-16) should detail all instances in my opinion. NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 01:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- i more meant removing the details of the original ANH one just keeping the last sentence, as i think that covers the idea perfectly. thoughts? BloodOfIrizi
(Syndicure) 02:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- 2nd+3rd obj. How's that? NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 15:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- 2nd+3rd obj. How's that? NBDani
- i more meant removing the details of the original ANH one just keeping the last sentence, as i think that covers the idea perfectly. thoughts? BloodOfIrizi
- I think tying this instance to the original and stating it's a recurring theme is enough. The original instance (VT-16) should detail all instances in my opinion. NBDani
re: last objection: given the recurring theme, id say its valid to list the T-S Seven and the VE Series as a vehicleBloodOfIrizi(Syndicure) 00:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- VT-16, T-15, T-17, and T-18 aren't listed as vehicles. Their sources are only the quotes from their narrative stories. In Legends it seems the VT-16 referred to a droid. But in Canon it hasn't been established what any of them are. The T-16 (referenced in Kanobi "Part III") is a vehicle, I'm hesitant to say any not directly linked to it as vehicles. We have Droids with R2 designations that aren't R2 series astromech droids and also the TS-series interrogation droid exists. Basically, I don't think we should assume. NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 15:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- VT-16, T-15, T-17, and T-18 aren't listed as vehicles. Their sources are only the quotes from their narrative stories. In Legends it seems the VT-16 referred to a droid. But in Canon it hasn't been established what any of them are. The T-16 (referenced in Kanobi "Part III") is a vehicle, I'm hesitant to say any not directly linked to it as vehicles. We have Droids with R2 designations that aren't R2 series astromech droids and also the TS-series interrogation droid exists. Basically, I don't think we should assume. NBDani
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 17:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)