Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Studio Mir Co., Ltd.

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was withdrawn. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Studio Mir Co., Ltd.
    • 1.1 (0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 DFaceG
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Studio Mir Co., Ltd.

  • Nominated by: Bonzane10 (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 19:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 103 words (0 introduction, 103 body, 0 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 133 words (0 introduction, 133 body, 0 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

Object

DFaceG
  • Most of the non-Star Wars related information on the article is irrelevant to Wookieepedia; primarily, their other works. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
    • In my opinion, adding their previous works are relevant to give some reference and understanding towards the company. I only mentioned some, not all. -Bonzane10 (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
      • Be that as it may, it contradicts precedent to include this information. It should only be included if it's crucial to the company's founding or the manner in which they operate, or if it's related to Star Wars in some form. For example, the Good article about Maxis mentions SimCity, but explicitly in relation to its importance in the company's founding. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 19:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
        • I see, thanks fot the input. Is it possible to take this nomination down? with the removal of the company's other work, I think the article is going to be too much of a stub, cheers! -Bonzane10 (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • The tidbit about them not being known in South Korea seems speculatory. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
    • noted and removed -Bonzane10 (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Overall, this article being nominated seems premature to me. We still have quite some time until Visions Volume 2 releases, and much more BTS information or news pertaining to Studio Mir could be released before then. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
    • ahh fair enough then.. I don't mind taking this down, if it does feel like a premature nomination for the judges(?). Do I remove the nomination myself? -Bonzane10 (talk) 19:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments