Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Snoke Cones

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Snoke Cones

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 22:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 13:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  4. Dentface (talk) 03:41, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
  5. Samonic Signatureicon (he/him) 18:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • Why not use the Company infobox and fill out the |products= field? Imperators II(Talk) 08:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
    • Added. The image isn't infobox width, but that's the highest resolution version of the image as far as I'm aware. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  • On the SW.com article I'm not seeing a mention of Starkiller Base, so how do we know it's not the throne from the Supremacy?
    • I compared both thrones to be sure, the design of the throne is the same as the one from Starkiller. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
      • Also changed it from "hologram-emitting" to "holographic," as the throne itself is part of the hologram in the film. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
        • I'd also like for there to be planet-level astrographic context for Starkiller Base. Imperators II(Talk) 17:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
          • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Relatedly, is "hologram-emitting throne" really something you should be referencing to that image, as opposed to, say, TLJ? Imperators II(Talk) 16:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
    • References moved per first objection's response. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Dani
  • I'm unsure "The Recruit" really establishes that R4 belongs to Fazon. Fortunately I think "Designing Star Wars: Star Wars Resistance" establishes this just fine. I'd switched the Recruit source for it again. —Unsigned comment by NBDani (talk • contribs)
    • I'll utilize "Unmotivated" for that instead, since it's a strictly in-universe source and Hype explicitly mentions his ownership of R4 - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
      • Scratch that, just used "Designing" since there's no reason to add another reference when this one does the job - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 22:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)