- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Phobos
- Nominated by: QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 08:25, December 26, 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Minor spoilers for Episode IX, I suppose.
(4 ECs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:23, December 26, 2019 (UTC)
- UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:44, December 27, 2019 (UTC)
Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 17:31, January 3, 2020 (UTC)
Fan26 (Talk) 21:19, January 3, 2020 (UTC)
Tommy Macaroni 17:17, January 6, 2020 (UTC)
Object
UberSoldat
"Following that practice, the 39th Legion was named after Phobos. Since the history of the Sith largely remained a secret to the rest of the galaxy, only members of the Sith Eternal were aware of the significance of the 39th Legion's name."I would suggest avoiding the repetition of names within the same short body of text. Also, I don't think the spoiler template applies here since the subject originates from a reference book. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:13, December 26, 2019 (UTC)- Adjusted the wording. Also changed the spoiler template to the generic one. QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 06:44, December 27, 2019 (UTC)
- Adjusted the wording. Also changed the spoiler template to the generic one. QuiGonJinn
Tommy
You need to link the date ref to the actual subject. You may not even have to reference the film at all, maybe "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker: The Visual Dictionary establishes the Sith eternal was active, and considered Phobos to be ancient, thirty-five years after the Battle of Yavin, which corresponds to the year 35 ABY, according to Star Wars: Galactic Atlas." depending on what the book actually says.TommyMacaroni 12:31, December 27, 2019 (UTC)
- Reworded. Sorry for the late response - New Years' Eve celebrations have lasted too long for me... QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 15:13, January 3, 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely satisfied with that, given that the VD uses the Hosnian Cataclysm as the 0 date, not Yavin. I suggest looking at what I did here. Tommy
Macaroni 16:47, January 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Ditto. QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 17:02, January 6, 2020 (UTC)
- Ditto. QuiGonJinn
- I'm not entirely satisfied with that, given that the VD uses the Hosnian Cataclysm as the 0 date, not Yavin. I suggest looking at what I did here. Tommy
- Reworded. Sorry for the late response - New Years' Eve celebrations have lasted too long for me... QuiGonJinn
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 17:17, January 6, 2020 (UTC)