Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Phelbos

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Phelbos

• Nominated by: Cevan (talk) 05:27, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Another Mando-related article, this one a little smaller than the previous one.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Dr. Porter (Talk|Contribs) 01:40, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
2. Imperators II^(Talk) 20:16, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
3. Corellian Premier^{The Force will be with you always} 17:02, January 17, 2017 (UTC)
4. Could Phelbos be that blue star? I suppose we might learn one day. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 17:15, January 17, 2017 (UTC)
5. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 14:28, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Dr. Porter

• Would it be appropriate to add an image of said rings? I've got a good one from Rebels lined up. -- Dr. Porter (Talk|Contribs) 08:13, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • I had thought about it, though I wasn't sure if there was enough room in the article to include an image. I would like to see the image you have though, if you don't mind, and see if I can squeeze it in without it displacing things too much. Cevan (talk) 14:24, January 10, 2017 (UTC)
    • There you go. The thing I like about Rebels is it utilizes the full 1080 pixels. -- Dr. Porter (Talk|Contribs) 00:11, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
      • Nice image! I've gone ahead and added it to the article. Thanks Dr. Porter! Cevan (talk) 00:34, January 11, 2017 (UTC)

Imperators II

• The "of asteroids" and "Mandalorian terrorist group" bits can't be sourced to the Vizsla Keep entry, they're neither mentioned nor illustrated there.
  • Fixed. Cevan (talk) 13:36, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
• The linking rule applies to reference notes, as well - everything has to be linked upon its first mention.
  • So would I link "The Holocrons of Fate" in the reference about it being the first episode of season three after the episode was already linked previously in another reference? Cevan (talk) 13:36, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
    • Here's a better example than that one: the first episode reference directly mentions both Rebels and its third season, meaning I should provide links to them there. However, both are mentioned just a short bit later in the regular body of the behind the scenes section. Should I link to them both in the reference, in the body of the section, or both the reference and the body? Cevan (talk) 22:43, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
      • Both in the body and in each reference. There's no harm in providing easy navigation for the reader.
        • Done. Cevan (talk) 18:28, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
• You haven't properly implemented the {{Cite web}} template, please take a look at Template:Cite web and check that you've added all the necessary fields correctly.
  • Should be fixed now. Cevan (talk) 13:36, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
    • It seems to me you can provide a link to the larger website in the "work" field. Also, per the Sourcing policy you should provide an archival link in the Cite web template. I've saved you the trouble of adding the archival field for the Dark Horse template.
      • Done. Thanks for getting the Dark Horse one. Cevan (talk) 18:28, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
        • Sweet. Imperators II^(Talk) 20:14, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
• I'm not seeing the date for the comic in the Facebook post, and, frankly, I'd prefer a full date in this case.
  • Added the full date. Cevan (talk) 13:36, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
• Also, I don't see how the fact that the comic was an adaptation is relevant to the appearance of the rings in it. Imperators II^(Talk) 10:28, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
  • Removed. Cevan (talk) 13:36, January 11, 2017 (UTC)
    • For future reference, when citing social media posts (like you did the Filoni Facebook one in the previous revision) you 1) must always upload a screenshot of the post and 2) should ensure the quote you provide in the template is exactly the quote that is relevant to the citation. Regarding the uploading point, a helpful tip to ensure your article's compliance with policy is to check whether your article hasn't automatically been landed in a maintenance category, like "Category:Social media citations without screenshots" in the previous revision. Imperators II^(Talk) 11:41, January 12, 2017 (UTC)
      • Got it. Thanks for all the assistance, Imperators! Cevan (talk) 18:28, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

Comments