- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Obsidian 8
- Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: For Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- LucaRoR (Talk) 16:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Object
UberSoldat
Hyperdrive objection applies here too, and Saber 3.UberSoldat93(talk) 09:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Removed for this and Saber 3. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
CC-8
Since the pilot link is only in the infobox would it be better to pipelink TIE pilot there?Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)- Linked TIE pilot. Could pipelink that alternatively. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
OOM
"in the upper atmosphere of nearby planets" this should be in relation to Bespin, so Bespin should be introduced there rather than the next paragraphOOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)- Source material literally only says that. No evidence it's related to Bespin, since CCG card mentions nothing about Bespin, and the picture's not a duck test Bespin scenario. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, that makes sense. However, one potential issue here is that the card is part of the Cloud City Limited set, which is themed around Cloud City. Can you check if all the cards in the set are related to Cloud City? If so, then I'd say it's alright to assume the image is of Bespin. If not, then fair enough. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- For one, that's literally speculation. Nonetheless, not tall of them are related to Cloud City, Bright Hope isn't. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, that makes sense. However, one potential issue here is that the card is part of the Cloud City Limited set, which is themed around Cloud City. Can you check if all the cards in the set are related to Cloud City? If so, then I'd say it's alright to assume the image is of Bespin. If not, then fair enough. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Source material literally only says that. No evidence it's related to Bespin, since CCG card mentions nothing about Bespin, and the picture's not a duck test Bespin scenario. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 20:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)