Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Loddu

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Loddu

• Nominated by: Cade Calrayn 16:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject The Old Republic

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 06:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
3. My edit OOM 224 20:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• The date can be mentioned in the intro.
  • Done. Cade Calrayn 20:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
• (Reviewing note) Just a reminder from WP:MOS#Linking: "Do not place grammatical articles (such as a, an, and the) in pipelinks (example: the [[Battle of Endor|battle]], not [[Battle of Endor|the battle]])." JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 04:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Please spell Mek-Sha out instead of hiding it in a pipelink.
  • At the time, the asteroid is nameless. Mek-Sha is the name applied a while later, after Prava is defeated in the Huttbreaker's Rebellion.
    • You can still introduce that info along with the name, and the appropriate referencing. UberSoldat93 (talk) 20:39, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. Cade Calrayn 21:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
• There is currently no connection between the date note and Loddu himself. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. Cade Calrayn 20:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Fan

• "turned it into a productive mining station; however, production was slow," I'm nitpicking here, but I find it oxymoronic to refer to Mek-Sha as a "productive mining station" and then turn around and clarify that produciton was slow. I think the article saying the station was functioning or operational or similar would make more sense here. Fan26 (Talk) 22:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Fair enough, the Codex wording was "bustling" but I can see the conflict. Cade Calrayn 18:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 16:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)