Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Kalevala

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Kalevala
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Imperators II
        • 1.1.2.2 Ayrehead
        • 1.1.2.3 The CP
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Kalevala

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:17, January 25, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another TCW planet and follow up to my nom of bombing on Kalevala.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work Lewisr (talk) 02:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 20:51, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:37, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 21:45, February 2, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:34, May 1, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • A slight difference in punctuation between the lead quote in this article and that on the bombing.
    • Fixed. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:21, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • "represented Kalevala" - represented where?
    • Done, though I'm not sure about the world's connection to the New Mandos. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:21, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • The Galactic Republic should be added to the infobox.
    • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:21, January 27, 2017 (UTC)
  • Context for Coruscant, Mandalore and the Death Watch needed. Imperators II(Talk) 08:04, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:36, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • 210 words, please provide or draft an intro, maybe it goes over 250. Imperators II(Talk) 07:03, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
    • Not enough info for a description section, so I just made a separate history section. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 07:05, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • There's kind of a conflict with WP:S Rule #1. Frankly, I don't see a problem with a short description section. Imperators II(Talk) 08:19, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
        • The note also says this: "If, of course, the information does not appear elsewhere in the article, then it is acceptable to source it in the introduction." As such, I would argue that adding a description section to the article would add nothing. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:58, January 31, 2017 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I feel it's worth mentioning Merrik's death since he ceases to be senator for the planet. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:36, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  • You don't actually say that Death Watch were behind the bombing. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:36, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
      • It is mentioned only. JS-4422 (talk) 05:15, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
The CP

Sorry bud, gotta enforce WP:Sourcing Rule 1: intros should not be cited. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:47, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

  • Please see above objection. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:49, April 30, 2017 (UTC)
    • Very well. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:34, May 1, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • I didn't want to add this as an objection because I'm not sure if there's an easy fix to this, and we might have to just wing with how it is, but I find the sentences in the history section to feel a lot like run-ons while reading them, even though they're not. This is because of all the context that's needed to be added; the sentences are simply a bit long and unwieldy to me, though I myself have a habit of writing such sentences, and I recognize sometimes there's a need for them. Anyways, take a look at it, but don't pressure yourself too much if you really can't find a way around this. Sol PacificusFirestorm 02:39, April 25, 2017 (UTC)