Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Internal Safeguards Division

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Internal Safeguards Division

• Nominated by: AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 05:12, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:24, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
2. —Tommuskq ^{(TAKE A SEAT)} 19:57, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
3. ProfessorTofty (talk) 20:12, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
4. JangFett ^(Talk) 23:45, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
5. Imperators II^(Talk) 22:38, February 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

• Just one minor thing - "despite Imperial edict banning them" - this isn't quite grammatically right. Would that be "despite the Imperial edict banning them," or "despite Imperial edicts banning them." ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:59, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Fixed; singular edict. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:04, February 7, 2018 (UTC)

Imperators Safeguards Division

• Can we get a more specific timeframe in the article that would justify the Rebellion era tag? It's a pretty limited window during the otherwise 20+ year-long GCW.
  • The book "describes the state of the Star Wars universe at the end of the first movie." Also, for the purposes of the sourcebook, the events of TESB and RotS hadn't happened yet, so we can date it to 0 BBY. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:19, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added ref, but I'm not sure the founded by field is necessary. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:40, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
      • NEC is written from an IU perspective and doesn't explicitly mention ANH, so the combination ANH + NEC alone can't work like that in the ref. Imperators II^(Talk) 21:25, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
        • Fixed. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 16:15, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
• If CSWE is the first to identify the subject by its alternate name, its Sources entry should utilize {{1stID}}.
  • Added. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:15, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
• Is "bureaus" used by the source?
  • Yes. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:15, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
• "though an agent was almost always on site" — this is presented as fact, but it appears to me this is also what "some sources claimed."
  • The source material seems to present this as fact but uses "some sources" in reference to the one-third figure. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:15, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
• You'll have to keep an eye out for Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game 30th Anniversary. :P Imperators II^(Talk) 15:48, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't think it'll contain any new content, besides a new introduction. I'm planning on picking up a copy all the same, though. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 20:15, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments