Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Dantooine: stone

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Dantooine: stone
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Grunny
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Dantooine: stone

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:38, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The only reason I can think of for why I decided to write this one up is I got enchanted by the Dantooine scenery descriptions in Star Wars Galaxies: The Ruins of Dantooine.
  • Date Archived: 16:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 182 words (0 introduction, 130 body, 52 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 186 words (0 introduction, 133 body, 53 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ENT, WP:FFGAMES

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 18:07, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 02:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 12:00, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  4. ECvote CometSmudge (talk) 16:57, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Grunny
  • Minor grammatical nitpick: "The painting's title, along with those of "Bespin: air," "Koler: fire," and "Mon Calamari: water," were the only ones of Isa's works mentioned". In this sentence, the subject is singular "The painting's title", the parenthetical “along with" doesn't make it plural, so the use of "were" is a grammar issue as it is saying "The painting's title were". So, this should be reworded a bit to make the subject match the verb, e.g. you could either make it something like "The painting's title was one of... along with..." sort of structure instead, or list all up front as one group without the parenthetical in order to use "were". grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 20:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Yeah it was a tricky sentence to write. Thanks to your suggestion, though, I think it should read better now. Imperators II(Talk) 21:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 16:57, 17 May 2025 (UTC)