Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Dankko Verrimuch

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Dankko Verrimuch
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Samonic
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Dankko Verrimuch

  • Nominated by: RogueWhistler (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote "Dankko, Dankko Verrimuch" - Elvis, probably JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
  3. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 15:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
  4. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 20:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Object

Samonic
  • Do we know who considered Dankko "experienced" and "professional"?
    • We do, I've restructured that bit. RogueWhistler (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Does Verrimuch's podracer appear in the comic?
    • No, or rather, none of the podracers in the comic is identified as his. RogueWhistler (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • "blue-lensed goggles joined by green material" Maybe you could call the green material a connector?
    • How does it look now? RogueWhistler (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • I'd recommend moving the starting point and thank you very much bits to the first paragraph so that the first paragraph is a mini "History" section and the other a "Personality and traits."
    • Done. RogueWhistler (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Missing Category:Individuals of unspecified gender and Category:Individuals with unspecified pronouns. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 11:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Done. RogueWhistler (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Since Fodesinbeed Annodue are two persons, I assume that Beed replied to a comment Fode made? If my assumption is correct, I'd recommend adding Fode's comment to the article's quote. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 14:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Done. It's a sentence fragment, but that's as-written. RogueWhistler (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 12:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)