- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Coalition for Improvements
- Nominated by: --Vitus InfinitusTalk 23:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- Date Archived: 17:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Final word count: 147 words (0 introduction, 87 body, 60 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:FFGAMES
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Lewisr (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
—spookywillowwtalk 03:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Fan26 (Talk) 00:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Object
Uber
Please check if that HoloNet issue in the Legends article is either a mention or an appearance and update the BTS as necessary.UberSoldat93(talk) 06:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- It's a mention --Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Fan
" realign wayward star systems back to the principles of the New Order. " this sounds less like an encyclopedic neutral description of what the organization does and more like an Imperial-biased mission statementFan26 (Talk) 20:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)- Not sure how to else reword it, that comes directly from the source. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could specify it was the Empire that saw them as "wayward"? UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Reworded. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could specify it was the Empire that saw them as "wayward"? UberSoldat93
- Not sure how to else reword it, that comes directly from the source. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 00:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)