- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Biravia system
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 22:29, September 24, 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
Tommy 
Macaroni 06:23, September 25, 2018 (UTC)- Fan26 (Talk) 17:03, September 25, 2018 (UTC)
- QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 07:19, September 26, 2018 (UTC) 
Exiled Jedi (talk) 10:02, September 26, 2018 (UTC)- grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:38, September 27, 2018 (UTC)
Object
QGJ
I think it might be better to combine refs 3 and 4 into a single one.QuiGonJinn(Talk) 06:12, September 25, 2018 (UTC)
- Respectfully, I disagree. The current format IMHO is optimally designed for ease of use and readability of the {{Planetnamia}} template. Throw in an additional parameter for the source in which Planetnamians appeared, and the template would grow too bloated, especially in the default Oasis skin. Plus it's not even readily apparent to me where the mention of that source would even go within the template's text. My main counterargument to your proposal, however, is the strong precedent for doing things this way, which has been approved by status article review panel members on roughly a hundred articles already. Imperators II(Talk) 16:09, September 25, 2018 (UTC)
- It could have gone like this: Given this principle, this article makes a similar basic assumption for the Biravians—a group that was featured in Order 66: A Republic Commando Novel—in relation to the Biravia system. But whatevs. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 07:19, September 26, 2018 (UTC)
- It could have gone like this: Given this principle, this article makes a similar basic assumption for the Biravians—a group that was featured in Order 66: A Republic Commando Novel—in relation to the Biravia system. But whatevs. QuiGonJinn
- Respectfully, I disagree. The current format IMHO is optimally designed for ease of use and readability of the {{Planetnamia}} template. Throw in an additional parameter for the source in which Planetnamians appeared, and the template would grow too bloated, especially in the default Oasis skin. Plus it's not even readily apparent to me where the mention of that source would even go within the template's text. My main counterargument to your proposal, however, is the strong precedent for doing things this way, which has been approved by status article review panel members on roughly a hundred articles already. Imperators II(Talk) 16:09, September 25, 2018 (UTC)