Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/AAD-4 assault droid

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 AAD-4 assault droid
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Imperators II
        • 1.1.2.2 ProfessorTofty
      • 1.1.3 Comments

AAD-4 assault droid

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:15, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 20:52, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:38, May 10, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 00:25, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 07:41, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:03, May 24, 2017 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 15:40, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  • Since The New Essential Guide to Droids apparently doesn't mention AAD-4, could you tweak the ref note to show how you arrive to the relevant info from that source? Imperators II(Talk) 06:39, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:11, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
  • The year can't be sourced to the CSWE entry. Imperators II(Talk) 06:48, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:11, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
ProfessorTofty
  • "The AAD-4 assault droid was a line of fourth-degree assault droids" - the wording on this feels grammatically wrong to me. I mean, I could be wrong, but I feel like it should be "AAD-4" was a line of fourth-degree assault droids," or "a model of fourth-degree asault droids," like the wording used in this article. I'll leave it to you, though. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:27, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
    • Its mentioned by both names, so both are ultimately correct. I've chosen to go with your suggestion however. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 03:57, May 24, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Anything in the quote that isn't linked in the article, has to be linked in the quote, which I guess would include "day." I fixed it, but if you want, you can change it so that it's linked somewhere in the article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:27, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I missed that one. I think I'll leave the specifics of the attack (i.e. end of business day) out to focus more on the article's subject. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:02, May 24, 2017 (UTC)