- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
AAD-4 assault droid
(2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)
Support
- <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 20:52, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
- Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:38, May 10, 2017 (UTC)
- Cevan
(talk) 00:25, May 12, 2017 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 07:41, May 12, 2017 (UTC)- ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:03, May 24, 2017 (UTC)
Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 15:40, May 25, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Imperators II
Since The New Essential Guide to Droids apparently doesn't mention AAD-4, could you tweak the ref note to show how you arrive to the relevant info from that source?Imperators II(Talk) 06:39, May 9, 2017 (UTC)The year can't be sourced to the CSWE entry.Imperators II(Talk) 06:48, May 9, 2017 (UTC)
ProfessorTofty
"The AAD-4 assault droid was a line of fourth-degree assault droids" - the wording on this feels grammatically wrong to me. I mean, I could be wrong, but I feel like it should be "AAD-4" was a line of fourth-degree assault droids," or "a model of fourth-degree asault droids," like the wording used in this article. I'll leave it to you, though.ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:27, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
Comments
- Anything in the quote that isn't linked in the article, has to be linked in the quote, which I guess would include "day." I fixed it, but if you want, you can change it so that it's linked somewhere in the article. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:27, May 23, 2017 (UTC)