Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/392 BBY

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 392 BBY
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Imp
      • 1.1.3 Comments

392 BBY

  • Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 06:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 192 words (0 introduction, 67 body, 125 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR, WP:NOVELS

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 21:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  2. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 09:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 20:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • Wookieepedia:Layout_Guide/In-universe#Infobox: "[All infobox material must be detailed in the article proper, with the following exceptions:] Dates in alternate dating systems for year articles (example: Year 65:3–64:2 before the Great ReSynchronization for 100 BBY)" — And when you remove those, I think what's left would probably look best just in a single paragraph, without the bulleted list. Imperators II(Talk) 17:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Reverted those changes. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Jedi beginning to travel in the Outer Rim and Jedi beginning to explore the Outer Rim are not really the same thing, which is it really?
    • Tweaked.
  • "Galactic Republic leader" - do we not have confirmation that Mollo was the Supreme Chancellor at the time, then? But still have confirmation that they held a leadership position in the Republic?
    • He did, correct.
  • Pretty sure we've interpreted the "Items may be listed by foreign release dates if there is a considerable gap between the subsequent American release date, such as several weeks or months, or if no American release date exists." clause of WP:LG before to list Timelines by the April 7 date, not the April 25 one. Imperators II(Talk) 09:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Was Celebration really considered an official release, seeing as a very small group of people could acquire it there? JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 18:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
      • Per the Discord convo, apparently so. Imperators II(Talk) 08:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
        • Changed. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
          • I'm afraid that's where you run into the issue I was facing when writing up Timelines astro articles: that SW.com page doesn't even mention April 7, let alone associate it with Celebration's start. (Nor does it technically even say that all those items would be available on the first day of the event...) This is how I had to go around it. Imperators II(Talk) 06:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
            • Borrowed that, thanks. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 20:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • Noting for the record that whether or not the BTS on this article should reflect the year's origins in Legends right now ultimately depends on the outcome of Forum:TC:392 BBY/Legends. (Personally, I'd argue that by default it should document that, since technically nothing's stopping this CAN from passing until that TC vote closes. Imperators II(Talk) 09:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Added. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 18:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 06:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)