Talk: TK-32028

Welcome, Shoretrooper TK-32028! Hello, and welcome to Wookieepedia! I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: General help A Wookieepedia Tutorial Wookieepedia FAQ Site policies What Wookieepedia is not User page policy User image policy Signature policy Voting policy Privacy policy Multiple account policy Talk page policy Other policies and guidelines Contribution help How to edit a page Sandbox for practicing editing Be bold in updating pages Manual of Style Layout Guide Sourcing Attribution Neutral point of view Guide to image use Things to do Glossary of common terms used on Wookieepedia Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —MasterFred(Whatever) 20:11, August 29, 2017 (UTC)

Uploading

While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images, which can be found under the "other policies and guidelines" link in your welcome message, and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Wikia's non-standard upload forms are not supported under Wookieepedia policy, and ignorance of the uploading rules is not an acceptable excuse. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. 1358 ^(Talk) 10:52, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

• The image you've been trying to upload, File:Procurer-SOR-0.png, has now been deleted three times. This should give you an indication that you're doing something wrong. All images must include a description, a source, and proper licensing information. This is done by using Special:Upload, which will prompt you to fill in the required information. Thank you. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:48, November 10, 2017 (UTC)
  • Again please take this advice, you currently aren't doing so and thus the images you're uploading are being deleted, if you add the source, description etc then there is no reason for them to be deleted --Lewisr (talk) 02:27, December 1, 2017 (UTC)

Notability

Please check Wookieepedia:Notability policy, droids that did nothing notable are not worthy of an article--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:13, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

• Please take this advice, many of the pages you create aren't really that notable enough to warrant a page to be honest, and even then its like you copied it from the legends page but altered it slightly --Lewisr (talk) 02:03, December 3, 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for three days for repeatedly uploading files without providing sourcing and licensing information. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. 1358 ^(Talk) 13:33, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Signing

Hello, don't forget to add a header and signing your name on talk pages, thanks!--Vitus Infinitus (talk) 21:25, December 10, 2017 (UTC)

Upload abuse, redux

Not only have you continued to upload images without following the proper procedure, but you are uploading files that are redundant to existing ones. I haven't blocked you permanently, because I honestly don't think you're acting maliciously, but if you continue to act with such persistent stupidity, I will block you for good. -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 03:14, December 11, 2017 (UTC)

Talk page

As per the above welcome template, "Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record." Thanks. 1358 ^(Talk) 23:09, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Editing other user pages

Hello. Please be aware that you do not have the right to edit another's user page without their expressed permission. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:46, January 14, 2018 (UTC)

Notability

If you're going to question the notability of pages then to be honest you should take a look at some of the pages you have made, it's pretty hypocritical for you to say a stormtrooper isn't worthy of having a page --Lewisr (talk) 06:20, January 14, 2018 (UTC)

• I completely agree.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 06:24, January 14, 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Unidentified Vulture Droid Squadron

Do you care to explain what this is about? I suggest you apologise to whoever this is aimed at before I warn you for a personal attack on a user --Lewisr (talk) 07:45, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

• Well fair enough but they are better ways to get your point across, next time just be respectful and don't let any frustrations get the better of you --Lewisr (talk) 17:52, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Venator

Star destroyer isn't a line, nothing in canon suggests that. — Tommuskq ^{(TAKE A SEAT)} 20:22, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Policies

If you aren't going to follow the policies then please stop editing, the policy says legends things which aren't named in a canon source shouldn't get a canon page, so that ship shouldn't have a page unless a canon source names it --Lewisr (talk) 20:22, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Images

Please stop changing images for no reason, that image you keep adding on WED-15 Treadwell droid is no way near better quality than the image on there, just accept it and stop changing live action images for animation images as you've been told several times about the live action being preferred --Lewisr (talk) 01:27, January 27, 2018 (UTC)

Imp II

This--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:37, January 27, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Notability policy

There isn't much I can do to change it I'm afraid, this was all decided long before I joined the site --Lewisr (talk) 03:32, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

• It has been deleted twice before so that probably should show you that it doesn't need to be created, there isn't much I can do about it though if you do make it again --Lewisr (talk) 03:37, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
  • Its not that you can't create it, but it was deleted before as it was a copy-paste of the legends page, then again for lack of notability and then the same reason again. If you want to make it again then no one can stop you, but there's a chance it'll just get deleted again --Lewisr (talk) 03:41, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Probably not unless its a copy-paste, but that doesn't mean others won't --Lewisr (talk) 03:45, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • Looks okay but now it depends on what happens next --Lewisr (talk) 21:58, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

Notability

Instead of fighting over edit summary please explain why the article should be kept or should be deleted in the article's talk page--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:55, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

• I don't want to engage in an edit war for the page, but I could change it to a verify tag and give seven days to people express their opinions if it should kept or deleted--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:59, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure since it was deleted for that before, but it could since the actions of the droid give him some notability. Let's see what other can say about it or maybe you could ask an admin--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:16, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
• Although this droid has a bigger role than other non-notable articles, if it was deleted many times in the past, it may be deleted again. You may want to ask an administrator on what they think--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:44, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Trooper

I believe it is not notable as this character has no significant, important, or meaningful contribution to the Star Wars lore except that it was a Death trooper. If this is made into an article then there would be an influx of articles about every minutia of Star Wars, and that is something we do not need to record. If you dispute deletion, I recommend that you trash compact it so that it can be voted on, also please don't forget to sing using four tildes--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:47, January 30, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Verify

Until an admin or more people give an opinion, so far there hasn't been a concensus, removing the tag could cause other user to tag it directly for deletion since as its been said before the page has been deleted 3 times for notability--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:02, February 2, 2018 (UTC)

Copying

Don't copy things from a legends page and put it onto a canon page, that isn't how you make a canon page. Also please make sure you source where the name comes from to prevent it from potentially being deleted --Lewisr (talk) 04:16, February 3, 2018 (UTC)

RE:TC

Sure, absolutely that way it will be faster to know if it deserves the article. Just be sure to do it correctly or if I see that you missed something I can fix it for you--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:11, February 3, 2018 (UTC)

• Done Forum:TC:Unidentified super tactical droid/Canon--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:25, February 3, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Rocket droid

I don't think so. Maybe just the leader of the squad, but personally I don't think anyone else from them deserve it--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:49, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

RE:OOM commander

Not sure, to me I don't consider it that important/notable, but maybe you could ask on the Legends talk page if it deserves a canon article. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:49, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Field

It isn't part of the template so it shouldn't be there--Lewisr (talk) 04:05, February 10, 2018 (UTC)

RE:tactical droid

Hey, I don't think it's necessary but if people want to remove it it should be trash compacted and not outright deleted.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:47, February 10, 2018 (UTC)

• No I don't think he's notable--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:21, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Inuse tag on your profile

Hello, I notice you have the inuse tag on your profile, you don't actually need the tag as no one except you (unless you give permission to others) is allowed to edit your page, so you can just remove it --Lewisr (talk) 05:00, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Fanon stories

Hi. Since it's fanon, it doesn't really matter what you link to. Just remember to keep it under 250 words. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:37, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Wip and user left templates

Hi, please note that {{Wip}} is meant to be used in the article namespace, not on userpages. Please remove it.

Furthermore, {{user_left}} is to be used if you're actually leaving the site, which is obviously not the case. In accordance with our Voting eligibility policy, your votes are voided while the template is up. Please remove it unless you're actually going to leave the site. Thank you. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:02, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Tx-20

Hey, good catch! His sensor color is only white, I don't know who added that it was red. It's also not sourced.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:39, February 13, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Pune Zignat

Hello, no, Pune Zignat was not identified in the end credits--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:36, February 14, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Notable?

Hey, I don't think any of the articles you listed are notable. General unwritten rules for creating an article or determining that it is notable are 1) If they have a name 2) Have significant dialogue 3) Play a crucial role to the plot of the episode they appeared in 4) Have significant BTS information unique to them 5) Is referenced in multiple sources. This unwritten rules have been detailed by administrators in the past in trash compactors or on user talk pages. Therefore, I do not believe that any of the articles you mentioned qualify for any of those. Articles where notability is questioned are largely because they do not meet these unofficial rules. Hope this helps for future reference--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:33, February 15, 2018 (UTC)

• Him acknowledging an order an being present for so little time is not worth an article in my opinion. I wrote down the basic unofficial standards above, hope this helps--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:27, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Re: STD

Hello, sorry I did see your message but forgot to reply, I will do them for you don't worry --Lewisr (talk) 20:58, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

• Done --Lewisr (talk) 21:00, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Creating articles

Hello, when you create articles, such as TJ-912's Recusant-class warship, please make sure that you source all of the information, follows the layout guide, add a notes and references section, and conforms to standards of quality for articles. Thanks.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:29, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

RE:TC

You can do groups of them but I don't think you can do all of them at once.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:04, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. Please create a new Trash compactor thread for any new articles you might want to vote on. Instructions can be found on the WP:TC page. Amending votes (includes adding new options) requires certain actions to be taken. Thanks. 1358 ^(Talk) 22:11, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Wookieepedia:Trash compactor/Unidentified battle droids, part II

Remember to add your own votes to the CT you made --Lewisr (talk) 22:22, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

• Word of advice: Cool it for a while on the TC nominations. We already have five active TC forums, which is plenty. Let them finish before nominating new stuff. Don't overburden the process. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:08, February 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • Typically 1-2 weeks. This is explained in the Consensus policy. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:16, February 20, 2018 (UTC)
    • That's not necessarily the best approach. Something could be notable in Legends for reasons that don't apply to Canon, and vice versa. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:33, February 21, 2018 (UTC)

Fanon warning

User warning: Fanon. Please do not add your own fan-fiction to Wookieepedia articles. If you continue to add fanon to the site, you will be blocked from editing. Your input may be more welcome on the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:24, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Live-action

If a live action image is available it's generally preferred over animation wherever possible, if there was a significant difference in how they look then a discussion about changing the image could be necessary, hope this helps --Lewisr (talk) 14:34, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Magnaguard

If you get a live action image of the Magnaguard then feel free to change it, otherwise it'll just be reverted --Lewisr (talk) 14:43, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

• The live action one is still better, just get an image from Revenge of the Sith if you really have to change it --Lewisr (talk) 14:49, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
  • Well using the live action image is still preferred, using the one of IG-102 is better suited in the history section rather than one of the ones there --Lewisr (talk) 14:52, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Security Droids

In my opinion none of them deserve an article, but I could be wrong--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:54, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

• In my opinion, they do not for the reasons I listed above previously: 1) If they have a name 2) Have significant dialogue 3) Play a crucial role to the plot of the episode they appeared in 4) Have significant BTS information unique to them 5) Is referenced in multiple sources. This unwritten rules have been detailed by administrators in the past in trash compactors or on user talk pages.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:16, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • If the junk droids do not follow the rules above that I believe warrant an article, then I don't think they should be made. That's my opinion--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:15, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • As a general group yes, but as individual droids they did not have notable importance in the plot, in my opinion. You can make the article if you want, but I'm just telling you what I think--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:59, February 24, 2018 (UTC)
      • Yes but it isn't notable due to I outlined above. That's my opinion though.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:48, February 24, 2018 (UTC)

Advice

Please don't keep asking people if they think droids are notable to make, the fact you have to keep asking probably means they aren't entirely notable enough to make and I'm sure they really don't want to keep logging in to see they have questions you could answer yourself --Lewisr (talk) 13:53, February 23, 2018 (UTC)

• If you can't decide don't pin the choice down to others, either just make it or don't --Lewisr (talk) 13:56, February 23, 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for three months for vandalizing while logged out. Considering this is your third ban, expect the next one to be permanent. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. 1358 ^(Talk) 03:07, February 25, 2018 (UTC)

In light of a more comprehensive investigation...
You have been blocked from editing for multiple counts of ban evasion and acts of vandalism from a wide range of anonymous IP addresses. With at least nine blocks to your name, this ban is permanent. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:57, February 25, 2018 (UTC)