Talk: JangFett/archive6

R3-S6

Hi! Are you finished with R3-S6 yet? There are a few refinements I'd like to recommend. Get back to me and we can discuss them! See ya! MillieMuddFan67 21:39, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

WP:TCW

Hey JangFett. As a holder of a reserved project (or projects) for WP:TCW, I'd like to notify you that all reserved projects that have not seen any recent activity are being removed in an attempt to do some "cleaning" for the new year. You are welcome to reclaim any projects by re-entering them on the list; this is just an attempt to clear out those projects that may never see any work at all. Please contact me with any questions you may have, and have a happy new year. :) CC7567 ^(talk) 23:13, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Savage Opress

Hello JangFett, You recently reverted my edit on Savage Opress. His home world is Dartomir. This is stated in the Star Wars Insider Issue 98. Please change it back. PreVizla 17:27, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

• Its hard to explain but I'll try. Go to the Star Wars Insider website and on the right were it says latest issue it will be that one. It says 98 under it, that's were I got the number from. PreVizla 17:43, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
• Okay. Am I free to edit Savage Opress now? —Unsigned comment by PreVizla (talk • contribs)
  • (edit conflict) Hey Jang, each issue of Insider has two numbers, one for the USA and one for the UK. #122 in the USA is #98 in the UK. :) Master Jonathan 20px ^{(Jedi Council Chambers)} 17:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

season 3?

i've been wondering if season 3 is going to be in lego star wars 3 because darth maul has been confirmed so it would be awsome if savage opress is in there so if you can please awnser—Unsigned comment by Darth maul opress (talk • contribs)

sorry i forgot

Meeting 31

Hey Jang, AC Meeting 31 has been scheduled for Saturday 15th, at 4 PM EST. If you can't attend, please leave notes. Cheers. :) 1358 ^(Talk) 13:56, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Ahsoka Tano

The edit before mine was a notice that said "Do not edit other people's comments", yet you removed my post on the Ahsoka Tano talk page and I'm curious to know why. I wasn't speculating on what would happen to her. I was just saying we need to wait and see before we add any information from the spoiler to the article because we don't know if it happens yet. What I said was "we should wait before including 'Yellow (dark side)' to her eye colour until we find out exactly what happens to her". 142.26.194.190 23:49, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

I'm new

Hey, I'm new here and I just had a question. I edited the savage opress page last night with some info that i got from star wars insider, and this morning i found that all of it was gone. you were the last one to edit it, and i was wondering whether there was some protocol that i messed up or whether there was a particular reason why it was deleted, or whether it was even you who did it. thanks! -cuyvaldar123946

Ahsoka's Fighter Symbol: Re

Hello, Jang! Just here to tell you that Ahsoka's fighter bears the symbol of the JEDI ORDER! Not Galactic Republic. JEDI ORDER! Please, do not revert my edit again. That is the right symbol, and it is not of the Galactic Republic.

• Thank you. I'm just trying to do my bit for the wiki. MillieMuddFan67 18:27, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Hello again! The symbol on Ahsoka's fighter is that of the Jedi Order. It is NOT speculation, and I take such inference as an affront. The Republic symbol is the small roundel on the wing. The large white symbol is the Jedi wings-and-saber emblem. Look on the Jedi Order page if you don't believe me. It's common sense. MillieMuddFan67 18:50, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
    • Alright, I'll drop the issue. MillieMuddFan67 18:58, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the tip. MillieMuddFan67 19:03, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Why retreat now and not an escape?

The title clearly says what I wonder about the article you reverted to your version about the Third Battle of Kamino? Why do they retreat, cause they are the bad guys and not the Jedi or what, mr. Fett? --Dangrievous 17:08, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Quiyyen

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Quiyyen has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 21:24, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Phobos

Hey, Jang. I saw you added SWG to Darth Phobos' appearances. Could you tell me more about that mention? QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 12:13, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks a bunch. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 15:00, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks again :) I've checked the SWG wiki and must have misunderstood the information there. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 19:46, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Dark side Ahsoka

Hey, Jang, wanted to let you know I've got several good screenshots of Ahsoka when she's gone dark side on Mortis. If you'd be interested in any for your workbench, let me know. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 16:46, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

• Any of these specifically you'd like me to upload? Or would you rather I upload them all and let you pick and choose? - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 18:34, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Here you go. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 14:04, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

*Sniffle* *Sniffle*

Obviously no body wants me here...

I guess i'm going to leave this wikia despite the fact that iv'e read every Star Wars book and Comic and that iv'e played and beat every Star Wars game and that iv'e watched every Star Wars video and read every data bank profile on starwars.com . Well i'm not going to keep rambling on about this...Good bye.....—Unsigned comment by Lego33 (talk • contribs)

Bric and Echo

Here are several images to choose from for each character. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 22:50, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Bric

Echo

Echo and Fives

The Citadel

Hey there Jang. I figured you'd like some nice images of Echo and Fives in their ARC trooper armor. So here ya go. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 20:59, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Counterattack

As requested. Here you go, Jang. If I might make a suggestion regarding Echo's infobox, the headshot presented above is both more "recent" IU, and also doesn't have the datapad partially blocking. Hopefully this gives you more than enough options to choose from. :) - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 17:59, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

• You know, if it weren't for the darned Episode Guide saying he died, I'd have almost believed they might have had him survive the blast. That image clearly shows him being blown away from the shuttle from the force of the blast, and just because they show his empty helmet wouldn't necessarily have meant he was dead. I agree with you, it's a shame, and waste of a good character. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 01:44, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for that. I was feeling like the new section in Destruction of Alderaan should be under the "Prelude" heading, I just couldn't for the life of me, figure out what to name the subheadings. - JMAS ^{20px Hey, it's me!} 03:50, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

Could I have the article about Sobeck ;)

Dear JangFett,

Could I ask if it possible for me to deal with the article you put an "Clean up" tag and could you give me a few pointers about what is wrong with it. So I could clean as well. Thank you very much...--Dangrievous 23:05, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

It's good to be back. I see a lot has changed since I left, especially you. An AgriCorps member. I'm impressed. Kilson 03:02, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

CT-21-0408

Sorry about that edit, didn't see the notice. Fett the 13th 03:59, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

OOU revamp

Hey Jang, if I remember correctly you passed at least two OOU articles during the big TCW web comic push that I caused last year. After talking it over with Menkooroo, we've decided that all OOUs, no matter the size, need a Main Character section (such as the one used on Into the Great Unknown. Also, Bts secitons on promoted OOUs must be changed to development sections. Menkooroo might be proposing a new OOU layout guide soon, so I would recommend going back and changing the TCW web comics to fit this new formula. I realize that you are extremely busy now, so if want me to re-work your articles, I would be happy to do so. Kilson 00:01, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

AC Meeting 33

Hey Jang, there is an AC meeting taking place on February March 19. Please make an effort to attend, or leave notes. Also, note that the meeting will take place at the normal time, '4 PM East coast daylight time even though you observ DST. Cheers. 1358 ^(Talk) 15:58, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Orto Plutonia named

Hey Jang. It looks like the Battle of Orto Plutonia has finally received its official name. Although I don't have a specific link to take you to the battle pack, it looks like one called the "Battle of Orto Plutonia" was made by Hasbro at some point—it's listed here on rebelscum.com, which is definitely a trustworthy source. Since you're the nominator of the article, I'll leave the updating to you. The name can be cited to the source entry (the {{HasbroCite}} one) that I added to the article's Sources list. Hope that helps. CC7567 ^(talk) 07:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

New Ahsoka image

Hey. I found a new Ahsoka image but I can't get it onto the site. I'm just not familiar with the uploading procedure you have on this site. Since you know better, I was hoping you may be able to get it on.

• Here's the link to the site I found it on. [1]
  • I promise it will look good in one of the articles relating to Ahsoka, or her own page. --SkyGuy-Let's chat! 00:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Alright. I just thought i would look great, since there isn't one like it on the site. --SkyGuy-Let's chat! 01:24, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Apology for Ahsoka Tano Talk page

Dear JangFett, I want to apologize for repeatedly posting my comment regarding possible additions to the personality and traits section of the ‘Ahsoka Tano’ page. I am very new to using and commenting on Wookieepedia. I did not see your comment about why my post was deleted and I did not understand why my second (and third) posts were repeatedly being deleted: [■20:05, March 21, 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Ahsoka Tano ‎ (Again, talk pages are not forums. This isn't the correct place to talk about this.]

I apologize for any problems I caused.

With my second post, I only wished to clarify what I was trying to point out when I started the thread “Possible addition to Personality and traits section”. After reading the first response I received to my question, I was afraid I had created the wrong impression with readers, since English is not my first language and I sometimes have trouble expressing my meaning clearly. Again, I apologize for the trouble I caused you and for the extra administration I caused you by repeatedly posting.155.240.161.3 13:04, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

More R3 stuff

Hey Jang. It looks like there's more stuff for R3-S6, unfortunately. He's been given a buyable Shop set in Clone Wars Adventures (I've posted the description [Link removed]), and the latest edition of the UK Comic introduces an "Infinities" story that involves R3, which should ideally be outlined in the article's Bts; it can be found here. Let me know if you have any questions. CC7567 ^(talk) 11:51, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Malastare

Hi JangFett! I would like to ask you a question about your recent edits to this article. I understand that the image was removed because of layout problems, but why did you remove "on the contrary" from the prelude? Thank you in advance.—TK-999 20px^(Talk) 13:32, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you for the timely reversion of vandalism you made.—TK-999 20px^{(Rise of the Empire)} 18:12, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Why?

Why does it say I'm being nominated Wookiepidian of the month? I've only done about 28 edits. Is there another AnyGuy or something? --AnyGuy 16:41, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Removing info

I was on the page of CT-27-5555 or "Fives". It had minor info on the Citadel. But when I came back to it the info was gone. I looked at the last updates it was you. I hope it will get updated. The Ahsoka page got updated on more recent info. Just making a point. --Theiman 15:31, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Tarkin

Well unfortunately the Clone Wars lacks a lot of detail (plot-wise), given that it's less than thirty minutes long. Most of the information I added reflects Tarkin, his actions, his beliefs, etc. Some of it might have been less relevant to his article (i.e. how the Jedi felt about him, Skywalker standing up for him, etc), but if it looked "play-by-play" then it was for the sake of adding enough detail so that the article could show exactly what Tarkin was going through at this point in his life. I shortened it down a bit, but if it still looks too long, then feel free to shorten some of it yourself rather than outright removing all of it since it's also a rule that information from any SW source (i.e. Counterattack, Citadel Rescue - neither of which were mentioned on Tarkin's page yet) has to be put into the article one way or the other. JRT2010 19:49, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Dark Acolyte response

About the whole image thing, I did my best to restrain myself, keeping to only one or two images per section, and ensuring that they're all at least two paragraphs apart. I don't know what to say about the image gallery. Jensaarai 05:58, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

• Just got rid of the gallery... and I gotta say I think it looked better with it. I'll get to trimming down on the images. Jensaarai 06:06, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Cya dude

I'm going to miss you man. Whatever you're doing now, I wish you the best of luck, especially with college. Kilson^{(Let's have a chat)} 03:34, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks JangFett ^(Talk) 19:21, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Dyer

Hello JangFett, I see that you originally made Dyer a GA back in summer of 2009. Just to let you know, his CCG card reveals that he is Force-attuned, which is considered canonical, and would thus need to be updated accordingly. Hanzo Hasashi 01:49, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

R3-S6

Hey Jang. Now that you're back, I'm wondering if you'd like to take over R3 again. I have no problem with monitoring it—well, except for tracking that pesky CWA game—but it's your article and your call. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 12:28, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

• OK, then. Seeing as I have quite a few nominations of my own at the moment, I think I'll focus on them and let you handle R3. QuiGonJinn 20px^(Talk) 13:49, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Eras

Thanks for the info. This will make my life less complicated :).—TK-999 20px^{(Rise of the Empire)} 15:29, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Tempest Force

• Hello JangFett, I'm looking at all the Endor Limited CCG cards at the moment, and in terms of Dyer, at least, I think there might be a source indicating he is in Tempest Force. See the Counterattack card, I'm hoping the link works. If not, it shows a picture of the Dyer's troops storming the bunker, and says "The Imperial forces on Endor quickly responded to the Rebel intrusion. Commander Igar (who commanded Tempest 1, the lead AT-AT of Tempest Force) had a plan in place to deal with such a commando force of Rebels." Hanzo Hasashi 15:07, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oh, and also with Grond, although I have yet to find that he was part of Tempest Force, it does say on the Outflank card that "Commander Igar's defense of Endor called for the use of speeder bikes to harass any attacking Rebels," and shows a picture of one of the scouts. And Grond coordinated scout trooper actions. Hanzo Hasashi 15:18, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
    • For what it's worth, though not a canon source, Tempest Force's article on Star Wars Holonet, a French website, says that probably only the AT-AT's and ST's were part of Tempest Force, while the stormtroopers, scout troopers, Colonel Dyer's men and the Imperial Navy personnel in the bunker were separate. Canonically however, some stormtroopers were identified as part of Igar's command, and the scouts, as I previously mentioned, were commanded by Igar. As such, I am going to remove certain members from the Tempest Force page here. Hanzo Hasashi 15:31, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

:)

Good to see you too Jang. I'm home for the summer, so I'll probably be around a bit more at least. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 17:45, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Jmmaar

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Jmmaar has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 21:22, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

QOTD

Hey. I nommed quote for the QOTD and it's at +12 but it hasn't been placed on day yet. It's the one from Bastila and Revan on the In-Universe quotes page. What should I do? --Gmalek ^{(Hit Me Up)} 20:53, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Dao

Hello, Jang. After some work, I decided to re-nom Dao. If you find some time, could you give him a review? I remember that some of your objections had not been adressed when I nominated him the first time. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 18:17, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you for the quick answer. I'm looking forward for your review. And I'm sure I could handle those CAnoms and GAnoms. At the 1st nom of Dao my time was short, but now there is more time and I will take care of him. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 16:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Sanctuary III GAnom

Hello, Jang. If there are no further objections that you see concerning the Sanctuary III article, can you strike your objection and/or add your support. I have responded to it and fixed the requested material, but it has been some time since you posted your suggestions. Thanks. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 01:35, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

• JangFett, I see that you have finally responded to the addressed issues of the Sanctuary III GAN, but without striking your objections nor by offering any new objections. I have given all the sources that can be found. One slipped by me early on that was an obscure indirect reference, but that has been remedied already. It may be that you are not trying to stall the success of this GAN, but it seems as if you are not reading my responses to your objection about references because you have just asked a question that was already answered just prior to your latest post. I posted that comment about a week ago. Can you please strike your objections if you have nothing further to add to the improvement of this GAN? Gethralkin^Hyperwave 20:12, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Re: TOR

Hey Jang! Hope all is going well. Feel free to take the Sith and the Jedi, if you like. I've got enough updating to do to keep me busy. Have fun! Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 05:43, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

• Hey Jang! Glad you had fun doing it (the trailers are always a blast to write about). Here are just a few things I noticed.
  • To introduce an unidentified character, it's usually best (and usually preferred) to say something like "A male Pureblood Sith master served the Sith Empire blah blah blah" as opposed to "This".
    • Thanks to Tommy, this has been taken care of. I'll keep this in mind in the future, however.
  • According to the synopsis for the Hope trailer, Malgus didn't get the Darth title until just before the Battle of Alderaan, which occurred at least a few years later. I suppose at this point he had taken the name Malgus instead of Veradun, but hadn't yet become a Darth. So in the intro and bio I would just call him "Malgus".
    • Good to know. I'm still getting used to TOR. :P JangFett ^(Talk) 19:24, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • You may want to mention that the lightsaber strike that resulted in the scar also destroyed/removed the Master's helmet.
    • Addressed
  • "Ultimately, as the Sith and Jedi Master's fight progressed, the Sith failed to see the Jedi's next move of activating the deactivated end of Shan's double-bladed weapon, which was pointed at the Sith's midsection." The prose here is a little muddled. It would probably be best to just say something along the lines of "As the melee progressed, the Master was incapacitated after the Jedi activated one of the ends of Shan's double-bladed weapon through his abdomen."
    • Addressed
  • It would help if you specify that the Jedi Master is a Zabrak, so you can refer to him as such. That way you can reduce the over-usage of "Jedi" and prevent any confusion when calling one of the characters a "Master."
    • Yeah, that helped a lot.
  • "able to deflect a missile that was launched from a trooper with his lightsaber." This makes it sound like the trooper launched it from the trooper's lightsaber.
    • Haha, addressed. How's that?
  • This one will need a P&A as well.
• Looks good, otherwise. I would suggest a mention in the P&A or bio that he was a Sith Inquisitor. It wasn't explicitly stated anywhere, but during the period, there were only two options: Inquisitor or Warrior, and he matches every Inq characteristics, and doesn't match any Warrior characteristics. That usually wouldn't be enough for me, but every other character in the trailers represents one of the game classes, so I think this one needs a note. At the very least, a BtS note. Good job! Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 08:00, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Trayus! As for the objection, Hmm, how's that for the P&T/bio? JangFett ^(Talk) 19:24, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • Looks good to me. I do think that the first half of the P&T should be in a dedicated P&A section, however. The second half and the last sentence can stay in a P&T. For the Inquisitor thing, I would suggest referencing it to the same reference I used for him on the Fall of Korriban article. Also, I did a bit of a copy-edit on the bio, just to remove some redundant wording or repeated words. Oh, and if you need/want any more pictures of him (since the bio picture is kind of just a large version of the infobox) let me know—I've got some good P&T/P&A images, if you would like them. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 22:47, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
      • Looks good to me. Here are a couple images. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 07:54, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

File:Sith penetrated.jpg|He's penetrated File:Korriban duel now with lightning.jpg|He throws some lightning

THX 1138

Excuse me, JangFett, why exactly did you remove my edit to Colt, THX 1138? Even if you didn't think that was a reference to the clones harsh life, it definetely was a reference to George Lucas' first movie, THX 1138. In my opinion, it belonged there.--Master Tej 03:23, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

• Then why not place a request to have that edited, or remove it until I edit it? If it was poor, then it can always be edited to conform to the standards on this site.--Master Tej 20:24, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: CIS capital

I'm aware of the discrepancies, but there's bound to be a retcon in there somewhere, given TCW's nature. Going by the latest source material is what we have to do to follow site policy. CC7567 ^(talk) 00:56, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

• Maybe adding "at one point in time" will help, since it could be that the status of capital world was transferred during the war. I'll add it to the article, and that'll hopefully clear up the inconsistencies, at least temporarily. CC7567 ^(talk) 01:09, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Apologies

Don't worry; it happens. :P CC7567 ^(talk) 21:18, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

CN Dataclips

Hey Jang. I'm not sure what your take on this is, but I personally have only been listing the CN Dataclips as sources for those subjects that get mentioned in the actual text parts of the Dataclips. Since the rest of the Dataclips are just stock footage of the episode, I haven't been treating them as sources that way, since that would be like listing the episode commentary on SW.com for subjects that only appear in the clips from the episode—I just haven't been using the Dataclips as sources for articles that don't receive any new info from them. That would mean that at best, Fives and Echo would only be (Picture only) for the Dataclips as sources, and I'm not sure if it's worth mentioning the dataclip for "The Deserter" on Crys's article. Feel free to disagree if you have better reasoning, but let me know what you think. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:17, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Question

Hi JangFett, i was wondering how 2 be an administrator. leave me a message—Unsigned comment by Watto421 (talk • contribs)

Bric

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Bric has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — CC7567 (talk) 23:24, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Talk pages

Ok, thank you for telling me. Teff 19:17, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Pureblood Sith Master

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Unidentified Pureblood Sith Master has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Kilson(Let's have a chat) 04:17, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

Oya, Jang

You don't like TCWs ether? Anakin Skyobiliviator 01:29, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Me? I personally...

...dislike everything from TCWs. As for clones, in TCWs, I think they: 1. Talk too much 2. Too weak 3. Has too many personalities 4. Has no instinct 5. Not uniform (I mean, different haircuts?!) 6. Any other criticism you can think of! From your fellow user: Anakin Skyobiliviator 04:16, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Essay

Hey Jang,

In effort to continue the chronicling of our FA history, I am asking and encouraging you to record your personal FA statistics here please, when time permits. Any questions, don't hesitate to ask, and thanks.—Tommy 9281 Friday, July 22, 2011, 07:13 UTC

Re:

I'll try to remember but i just dont know what you have to correct so much. i mean i put down the web page i got them from and the rest i just think i know. thank you for your help though.--CC-1990 20:16, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Images

I wasnt quite sure if filoni was the artist behind these pictures that i uploaded from the star wars blog on comic con. I thought since he was leading member of the team for the clone wars tv show i thought he was the right choice and thank you for your tip.--CC-1990 12:50, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Treve (second nomination)

JangFett, could you please reload the infobox on Treve? Next time i will do it, but this time i would like to see it done by someone experienced. Thank you,--Talrrivanian 15px ^{(Headquarters)} 14:37, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Nub

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?" Nub has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Kilson(Let's have a chat) 17:15, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

N-K

Nice work on N-K I played SWG since launch,then quit the game 09 because everybody was gone,—Unsigned comment by MasterMason777 (talk • contribs)

Unidentified Pureblood Sith Master/ Vindican

Hey Jang - a quick heads up: Unidentified Pureblood Sith Master was moved to Vindican; TOR released a name for him, and the article's been modified a little. Thought I'd let you know in case you hadn't seen the move so you can check it out and make sure its retaining its quality :) - Cavalier One20px^{(Squadron channel)} 00:54, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Color

I disagree with you on the fact that colors should be linked to their own page, and unless you can give me a policy that says other wise I think that that is simply personal preference. Darth Needham 22:55, August 20, 2011 (UTC)

• I really don't see why red skin colors shouldn't link to red—Unsigned comment by Darth Needham (talk • contribs)

Thanks.

I was working on giving citation on the arcticle so I thought it was a good idea to remove it. Sorry. --Nihilus 16:01, August 21, 2011 (UTC)

The Clone Wars Season Four: "Death Watch" and Appearances section

Jang, I thought, since the "Water War" preview is part of the episode Water War (which I edited to fit the teaser)the "Death Watch" preview would have its own episode similarly titled. I wanted to add it to the S4 page but wanted clearance from a high ranking Wookiepedian. I also think an appearances section for season 4 should be added to the page and the other season pages as well. I would like your assisstance if you approve. -Sean Red 00:01, August 26, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Hammer

Smells like fanon to me. Offhand, I can't remember any source (even random Hasbro sets) naming a clone as such. CC7567 ^(talk) 05:41, August 26, 2011 (UTC)

I was just wandering....

What does Non-canonical and canonical mean?—Unsigned comment by Mandalorion merc (talk • contribs)

Fives

Hey Jang. I just wanted to let you know that the three-week mark of inactivity for unaddressed objections on the Fives Redux just passed a few days ago. Please make sure to get to the current objections soon; right now, the article is in danger of losing its FA status altogether. Thanks. CC7567 ^(talk) 05:45, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

• If you're unable to put in the time at the moment, I'd suggest asking others for help—if it really comes down to it, I can see what I can do with the stuff myself, though I'd still have to leave the majority of the work to you. I'm going to have to start a removal vote soon, however—exceptions can't be made when it comes to inactivity with objections. Please see what you can do. CC7567 ^(talk) 19:34, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Lola Sayu nom

Just letting you know I addressed every issue you had with the article... DjMack 01:42, September 5, 2011 (UTC)

R3-S6 and the damn Steelers

As a Bengals fan, it pains me severely to point this out, but as a Wookieepedian, it's my duty. :P Apparently Filoni is a Steelers fan, and the Steelers just published this interview with him. Near the end, Dave is asked, "Do you try and incorporate any Steelers subtleties into your show?", to which he responds, "Every now and then I will do something really subtle like making an R2 unit black and gold for the city." Now, AFAIK, R3-S6 is the only black and gold astromech droid to appear in TCW, so this would seem to indicate that his color scheme is a homage to my most hated NFL team. I'll leave it to you to incorporate this little factoid into the BTS. Master Jonathan — ^{Jedi Council Chambers} _{Monday, September 5, 2011, 20:15 UTC}

Orlando, Florida

Do you feel that mentioning Orlando, Florida twice in 2 consecutive sentences is repetitive? (Celebration VI) It's also clear from the way the entry for VI is written in Celebration that we're not talking about Orlando, Kentucky. BrokenSphere (Talk) 15:28, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Hydroid medusa

Hey JengFett. I created the article for Hydroid medusa, but realized I forgot to include the hyperlink to the source I cited. In readding it, I saw that you had added a tag that read, "This article's name or topic requires confirmation from the listed source(s)." I wasn't sure if adding this hyperlink to the source resolved that issue, or if this tag was added simply because the episode hasn't officially aired yet, so I wanted to drop by and ask you. Let me know. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 06:45, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

Meena Tills is a lady! TCW fact

Dude, why did you revert the edit on his/now her article! Did you watch the episode!? ;)

The show's credit displayed MEENA TILLS voiced by Anna Graves... and that means he is now a she! lol I know you are going to remove it again and in two days time you or CC will add that he is now woman! --Dangrievous 13:05, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Ki-Adi

Believe you me, that head quote is definitely going to change. I feel like it's a pretty lousy quote to represent the article, really. I just haven't decided on which one to replace it. One possible contenders are An'ya Kuro saying "You are a great Jedi, Ki-Adi-Mundi, noble and true." Another is an exchange between Yoda and Mundi: Yoda: "Of all living Jedi, have you only the skills to defeat Sharad Hett." Mundi: "You flatter me, Master Yoda." Yoda: "The truth only, I speak." Wasn't sure about either one yet, though, but I'm sure another will pop out at me from my notes as I work on the article. Any thoughts? — Hunter Kahn 04:34, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

• Ok. Nothing springs to mind immediately, but I've taken pretty detailed notes from Mundi's various appearances, and as I go through them and update the article, I'm sure I'll find something. — Hunter Kahn 04:52, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Dogma

Hello there JangFett, I noticed you said the information on the page of Dogma (clone trooper) was not confirmed. Is there anything on that page that could be added or removed to/from that page that could remove it from the Speedy Deletion category? Bane7670 21:05, September 22, 2011 (UTC)

Ahsoka Tano

You seem to have a problem with my edits (Tarkin, Tano, etc). While I disagree with your reasons, it might be more efficient if you just correct the problems you see, rather than completely undoing everything. Now unless it's about bad grammar, speculation or lack of sourced info (none of which is the case here, but just saying), it just seems ridiculous to undo it all. If you think it could be better, than change something or add to it, rather than just hitting the undo button. JRT2010 15:13, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

• Regarding the first part on my explanation for the Tarkin edit, that was just sarcasm, which I only gave into because I believed your reversal was uncalled for. I neither added speculation or unverified info; I simply added an image and rearranged a few others. I never meant that I "own" the section because I wrote it, but I'm sorry if you interpreted it like that. As for Ahsoka, I caught my mistake at "Like all Jedi, Ahsoka Tano was trained to adhere to the principles of the Jedi Order and the light side of the Force." and added the sources that explain her past before the Clone Wars. As for "extreme determination to win at all costs", she demonstrated that in moments like when she got her squadron killed by refusing to follow orders, or when she refused to pull back at Felucia; and Luminara did disapprove of Ahsoka for not adhering to the Jedi way. As for "Like many of her fellow padawans", I'm not even going to go into the long list of padawans who demonstrated traits like impulsiveness, but just to make a few examples: Anakin Skywalker, Obi-Wan Kenobi (Episode I), Pix and Cal (Jedi: Yoda), etc. Even Yoda admitted in Episode II that younger generations in the Jedi Order were too sure of themselves. Hence, yeah many young Jedi were indeed prone to reckless behavior. On those points, I should have added more sources to be specific. Yet those sources should be added, rather than just reverting everything back to its previous state. But I see you just did that again, anyway. Once again, I don't see how reverting the section back to a state where some of the paragraphs are one to two sentences long, or fail to conform with this site's writing standards, is better than simply improving/fixing what I added. But whatever, I'm not gonna start an edit war with you, even if you revert entire sections as if you "owned" them. JRT2010 16:36, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I appreciate that. If I need tips on how to revert entire edits, rather than going through them and fixing what I perceive to be mistakes (grammar issues, lack of citations, etc), I know just who to ask. JRT2010 16:40, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
    • The only issue I had with your "logic" is that you seem to think that the current state of Tano's P&T section is acceptable. It is long overdo for a rewrite, and while some of what I added may have been flawed, I don't believe it called for a complete reversal—especially back to its current state. If more citations were needed for better clarification, then point this out to me, preferably before you undo everything rather than after. The only issues you seem to have with me are sources and the way I worded certain phrases, all of which could have been addressed without simply hitting the undo button. Secondly, I never "assumed" that Ahsoka acts like "such and such" because of a comic (Jedi: Yoda, I believe you're referring to). I was pointing out some of the other apprentices who behaved rashly. You accused me of adding speculation for, amongst other things, adding the phrase "Much like many of her fellow padawans,". I never said she behaved recklessly because of other apprentices. I pointed out Cal and Pix as examples to back up the phrase. They are her "fellow padawans" and they demonstrated similar behavioral patterns (rashness, for instance); so did Skywalker and Kenobi when they themselves were padawans. JRT2010 17:44, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
      • At this point, I won't even dispute the Ahsoka issue anymore. This is getting us no where. I also thought some more about the Tarkin issue and I want to apologize once again for that. When you reverted my edit and said it was fine, I was actually agreeing with you when I changed it back—my reason (other than the fact that there was nothing wrong with my edit to call for a full revert) being that I wrote the TCW section, which was not meant to imply that I thought I "owned" it. If I had known how very sensitive you were, I probably would have chosen different words. Since you believe my response was uncalled for, then I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. JRT2010 18:06, September 27, 2011 (UTC)

Reverts

Hiya JangFett, just responding to the comment left on my talk page about unverified information. I am just a bit unsure about the reason for the reversion of the Mon Calamari article which I was working on. I did add footnotes to the sources which included information from TCW Water War, Gungan Attack and Prisoners plus added a quote from the last one which you reverted in the Dac article. If I might ask for clarification on the one unverified source? If anything, I was attempting to add more verified sources since I had worked on the Mon Cal page before and been trying to add more citations. There is one bunch of information in the article that has no citation and I have no idea where it comes from namely the part about the Mon Calamari being transformed into a warrior culture by contact with the Empire. Anyway, any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you. Darth Batrus 15:53, September 27, 2011 (UTC)

• Many thanks JangFett, I appreciate the quick response and it helps a lot. On the Mon Calamari Guard and Mon Calamari Knights issue, would it be better to add that the two operated in the Clone Wars to circumvent the issue of when they were established? Anyway, thanks again. Darth Batrus 16:10, September 27, 2011 (UTC)