Talk: Jack Nebulax/Archive 5

< User talk:Jack Nebulax

Me again

Hi, what's Palpatine's (not scarred) first appearance?

Is it Episode I or Episode V

He asked for Palpatine's NOT scarred first appearance, which would have been Episode I. --Promus Kaa 04:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

No Subject

  • Wookieepedia is becoming a manipulated and unreliable source of Star Wars information, I'm afraid. You'll be happy to know that I will know longer edit it, under any of my user names. Lucas Wolfdog 00:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
    • What?! Come on, don't do this just because I reverted some of your edits. You have plenty of good edits. Don't let this one thing make you leave. Wookieepedia needs good people like you around here to make sure everything is correct and to help make the place better. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Wow, I wasn't expecting that apology. Maybe I was also too harsh for threatening to leave. Alright I'll stay a user. I just need others to read my suggestions and help cooperate. I tend to be a guy for cleaning up pages, trying to redirect or merge pages that are unnecessary, and delete those that I believe are just clogging Wookieepedia. I'm just trying to help clean it up (for example how i tried to make one page about heavy-weapons type clone troopers, instead of the separate clone heavy trooper and clone trooper heavy weapons specialist pages). But from now on I will try to get the approval of at least another Wookieepedian before I do anything too drastic. Lucas Wolfdog 01:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
        • The thing with those is that we don't know if they are all the same type of clone trooper. Since they have different names and seem to be trained for certain purposes, they really should remain separate articles, that is, unless George Lucas or someone from LucasArts says "Oh yeah, those two types of clone troopers from those two games are meant to be the same". And thanks for staying. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry but I read that Yoda defeated a Dark jedi on Dagobah 27 months after Geonosis during the Clone Wars. Therefore, it is impossible that he defeated that Dark jedi at 700 BBY as it is written at his biography.

Battlefront Characters

OK, here's my Battlefront II issue: If only the storyline is considered canonical, why do we even have articles on the playable character types? (For example, Clone marine, Clone engineer, Droid marine, etc.) Even if these soldier classes can be accepted as canon, don't they just cause even more confusion and frustation like disputed-canon "Clone Commanders" wearing the same armor as canonical "Galactic Marines", etc.? Lucas Wolfdog 01:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

  • The "only the storyline is canon" thing is confusing. That's the only thing that doesn't go against other canon. The types of playable characters in the game are canon, it's just their appearance that go against canon. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 01:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Unknown Aid

Hi its Plokoonmastery here. It dosen't tell you who inplanted Darth Mauls Cybernetic legs after he gets sliced in half by Obi Wan Kenobi. Oh yeah, and thanks for the tip about the images.

A-66

Page is up, the info I worked with to create is cross posted from the TFn boards on my talk page.--Clone Commander CT-5619 SPHA-T comm system 21:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Question

Is my userpage ok? As in, does it comply with the "rules" of the Star Wars wiki?

Reply via my talk page pls.

Anakin Thomas 17:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Dude

Don't they say things like...don't have too many images etc?

P.S I want a nifty signature, how do I get one?

Cheers

Anakin Thomas 10:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Sometimes. And if you want to make your own signature, go to Preferences, User profile, and Nickname. In the nickname box, type in what you want for your signature. And also, please stop posting at the top of my talk page. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 14:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Dude 2

Why do you keep changing the position of the Arc Hammer image? It's place is in the BtS section, and if you put it on the right (which you insist is 'better'), it's just shown BELOW the infobox, way beyond the BtS section. I don't know what resolution you have, but it definitely looks WORSE to me that way MoffRebus

  • How does it look to you like that? Because the way it is on mine, it's still right by the Sand Blasted information, and there's still space between it and the infobox. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
    • That's how it's shown to me... if you still think it's better... I rest my case :S MoffRebus 13:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, they're similar, but still, I suppose it wouldn't hurt by keeping it on the left. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
        • That's great we came in a conclusion. I still wonder how it showed to you though :) MoffRebus 13:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
          • If I could upload pictures from my digital camera, I would show you. ;) Anyway, the locations of the pictures were very close, but there was a small difference or two. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Imperial dungeon ship

Thanks. Atarumaster88 18:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Seppie Droid army

No problem guy, I consider it water under the bridge. Though taht bobafett character was an odd one. Lowkey 23:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Will remember in future

Anakin Thomas 12:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't bite the newbies

When you told that user not to remove images, it would have been more helpful to say, "I removed that image from (article) because it was poor quality and didn't illustrate the topic of the article," or something like that. When you said, "Don't remove images," it sounded like you were telling him "Never edit the images used in articles under any circumstances." A new user being told that may not understand why you're objecting to his or her edits, and might just come to the conclusion that the users here are very protective of their articles and don't really welcome new editors as a matter of principle. That's why I felt that I had to clarify your message. —Silly Dan (talk) 18:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Agreed, remember, we are not wikipedia Anakin Thomas 18:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
    • ?? Not biting newbies is a policy or guideline there too. —Silly Dan (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
      • I was merely commenting on the way Mr. Nebulax tries to run, or at least impliment the wiki Anakin Thomas 18:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
        • He's trying to insure continued high quality, which is a good thing: the message above was just to express my personal concern that he could be doing so in a more newbie-friendly manner. —Silly Dan (talk) 18:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
          • The thing is, the user had been removing tags and messing with pictures before the Boba Fett article incident. To my knowledge, he had already been warned at least once. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 18:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
            • You were definitely justified in asking him not to remove that image, or at least explain why he preferred the painting of Fett in Jabba's palace to the ESB screenshot: it just might have been more helpful to be more specific in your criticism. In addition to coming off as less harsh, it would have helped him figure out how images are used here to begin with. —Silly Dan (talk) 18:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating me, Jack

Since I set some special comments aside for you, Jack, I thought I should post this here for you to read personally, though you can respond wherever you please. Here's what I said on my own discussion page:

Uhhhhh..... WOW! I'd like to thank the Academy...

Seriously, folks, believe it or not, I had no idea that there was even such a title, let alone that I was nominated for it more than once, let alone that I won or could win. To tell you the truth, I'm not even sure why I've won, because, as Eyrezer correctly pointed out, my work really has been limited to the Palpatine page. Sure, I've spread out some from there, but hardly enough, I would have assumed, to be nominated for a damned thing.

If I feel joy at anything, it's that so many people think my work has merit, including many with whom I've had some sharp discussions in the past. It validates me and makes me feel like I've made some small difference here in the almost-year that I've been a Wookieepedian. I thank all of you who voted, one way or the other (yes, selfishly, I'm glad for those who voted for me, but I'm just glad somebody gave two craps for me and had something to say at all, good or bad).

I want to thank Jack Nebulax, who continues to invent new naval ranks for himself to accomodate his meteoric rise to power, for being my proofreader, conscience, and both my ally and enemy, as the occasion warranted. But mostly, for always doing what most helped the article. After any large-scale work of construction, someone has to sweep up the leavings, clean up the mess, watch what the crew is doing, and I could ask for no better foreman than Jack. I've made many friends here, and of all those, Jack did not give his support to me easily or quickly, which is what makes it so valued to me now.

I also want to give a special note of praise for Kuralyov. Having learned about my previous nominations, I took the time to look at the voting records, and at no time has Kuralyov ever wavered from his convictions. He doesn't care for my work, and I'm genuinely sorry for that, but he understands why he doesn't (NPOV, non-encyclopedic formatting), and says so consistently, and he never wavers from that heartfelt conviction, which is guided by a love of Star Wars and the Wookieepedia that is the equal, if not the better, of mine. There aren't enough men of courage who stand firm in their beliefs, regardless of whether I agree with them or not. In this world, where, as Yeats wrote, "The best lack all conviction, and the worst are full of passionate intensity," people like Kuralyov make things better. We don't have to be in agreement for me to find him worthy of my respect and, if he will have it, friendship.

Once again, thank you all.

And I mean every word of that, Jack. Thank you. :) Erik Pflueger 18:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Frikki the Hutt

Me and Sgt.pepper

it's just a joke!!

Posting in the middle of discussions -- maybe I'm wrong

OK, maybe I'm screwed up about this. However, I was always under the impression that so long as the comments are short, and it's done in such a way that the readers can tell who's replying to whom, it's OK to post a comment in the middle of a discussion. When were you told not to do that? —Silly Dan (talk) 00:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

A favor to ask

I am working on merging the personal deflector shield and personal energy shield articles, and I was wondering if you would be so kind as to take a look when I am finished and tell me what you think. If you would, please let me know how I can show you what I see in the sandbox. - Angel Blue 451 17:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

  • My article is getting *sniff* merged! Good thing, too. Atarumaster88 03:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Extra spaces

  • I wouldn't remove them if they were actually necessary. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
    • They are. As I explained in a topic that is now archived, I stated how removing spaces sometimes cause problems for me. Well, the "youmay" template is one of them that causes problems for me when there's no spaces separating it from what's next. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

A few short seconds of your time

Signature test.

Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) (Data file) 20px 23:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Sitenotice

I honestly have no idea. Coding is not my forte by a long shot, and if I tried to change it I'd almost certainly make it worse. Kuralyov 00:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Senate Hall

I've started a discussion about all thse object articles, can you please go to the senate hall and comment and vote, thank you Jedi Dude 23:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Hey it's me, I know I'm late, but I haven't really gone on this site since. I'm sorry for what I said, but I felt like my ideas were being stepped on one at a time. I apologize for the way I acted. I just feel like I'm not of any help around here. User: Super Destroyer 92

Anakin's Lightsaber

Hi, i was just wondering if you can prove that Anakin's second lightsaber was built using Adgean crystals as you seem intent on saying. Because as far as i knew there is no construction details on the lightsaber. To my knowlege there is no source that is cannon that directly states that Anakin uses Adgean crystals. As far as we know he could have used one he found on Naboo while protecting Padme. Unless you have a viable source, i would ask that you remove that submission as it can not be proved. 16:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagain

  • I don't have a source for the information—I just thought it was sourced and you removed it for no good reason. Also, we have no proof Anakin built his second lightsaber on Naboo. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 16:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • All except for the fact that after Geonosis Anakin immediatly goes with Padme back to Naboo, and then when he comes back and goes into his first battle of the Clone Wars he is armed with this weapon. So either he built it while flying between Naboo and Courscant (unlikely) or he built it while on Naboo.

16:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagain

  • Or he went to Ilum and contructed a new one. Either way, it's speculation. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 16:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I dont really see how he had time, because After Geonosis he went back to Naboo, (As Obi-Wan says) then less than a month later Anakin is fighting in the clone wars as he was assigned to teh Dark Reaper project along with Obi-Wan. And sure it is speculation, but it has more proof and rasonability behind it that him using Adegan crystals. Because really Anakin spends several weeks on cushy Naboo, returns "Sry Master Kenobi cant fight, must go to Illium, havent quite gotten aroud to building that new lightsaber yet." Knowing Anakin's personality, once he and Padme got back ot Naboo he would begin construction.

16:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagain

  • I dont want Naboo in the artical, you are right it is speculation. My point is only that if your are eliminating the Naboo part as speculation you have to elimiate teh crystal part because it too is speculation. I am sry if i was unclear. I am merly saying you cant eliminate one part because it is only speculation and not eliminate another that is speculation as well.

16:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderWillriseagain

    • Maybe Impassioned Jedi had a source for the Adegan crystals. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 16:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
      • I doubt it, because i have personaly searched literaly every source out there for information on the creation of the secone lightsaber. And their simply is none. I have searched everything and the closest i got was the pic of the crystal in the StarWars visual dictionary adn that dosen not lable what kind of a crystal it is. There is no info about this.

16:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagian

    • Then don't include any infomation, there is no place for speculation, especially on a users talk page Jedi Dude 16:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

172.213.158.19

Mandalorian Jedi.

It wasnt fanon and anyways could a jedi be a mandalorian

barden jusik

Box

Signatures

Sorry to bother you again but can u help me with creating signatures? Jaina Solo 19:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

You're doing it again....

If you think an article written by a new user is unnecessary, please explain to them why. Just saying "we don't need this" does not help them become helpful contributors: it's more likely to make them think the editors here are just unfriendly to newbies. —Silly Dan (talk) 16:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Barrow Oicunn

You're the 'Go to guy' on Fleet stuff, so I wanted to ask if you could check & confirm whether the Talk page for Barrow Oicunn has correct information pertaining to flagship status. I wrote my entry on the Talk page based on what I remember of real-life military (naval) protocol, but it might not gel with the GFFA.Tocneppil 17:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

SW-4 userbox

Jabba/Xizor pic. - continued

  • No sence talking about this on Baba's page. Agree? I, in the past two days, dramaticly edited Jabba, adding alot of my own snapshots. In the prossess I edited Xizor / Jabba image for black sun. I took off the sigs. I'm asking you if I should revert that. --Jabbathehuttgartogg 30px 30px 01:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Personal Info Boxes

Where can I get some to use in my own profile?? --Promus Kaa 04:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Nebulass

Uhm, why do they call you Nebulass? James Teterenko 13:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

DavyJones

  • If people post nonsense on talk pages like this guy, don't respond to them. It only encourages them. If they persist, alert an admin. There's no point to continually telling them "this is unnecessary." since it only prompts them to keep posting nonsense. QuentinGeorge 22:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Galactic Republic

wasn't Valorum supreme chancellor in 32 BBY? Emperor of the Milky Way 17:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Scroll Box

Sorry about that. I'll stop using it until the issues are resolved.Bonko 18:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

To scroll box or not to scroll box

  • Fleet Admiral, I was working on Wedge Antilles and noticed that there was a scroll box on his Appearances section. While I know you are a vehement Imperial, you have 20k edits. Do you think that should be made a sub-page or kept a scroll box? Atarumaster88 01:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I now know. Atarumaster88 02:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Wat Tambor, San Hill, Shu Mai Articles

Dear Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax, I am aware that you may be displeased by my work, espescially since you have been against me since I made the Planets owned by the Techno Union article. I would formally adress my regrets and apologies. My referance to the Friendship of 3 of my favorite seperatist is an observation of a pattern I see in the movies and books, as the three are seperately or collectively seen together or talking together or are refered to collectivley. They also have their seperate corporate entities helping each other in their various projects and planetary acquisitions. So if you are so upset I apolpgize, but I shall not defer from my continued use of the referance. As for the constant deletion of the RedLink Executive, I shall continue to do so. Unless, that is of course, it goes from red to blue. Seeing how you are so interested in the matter why don't you fill the gap yourself. You seem to like to correct everything else yourself, why is this so different? Also I would like to point out that the extended Boba/Tambor paragraph, the links are simply not that necessary to my eyes. If you would like to convince me otherwise please do so. I am sorry once again if my work displeases you, and not just as a Wookipedia user, but as a good citizen of society, I hope we can resolve this editing conflict peacefully. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely, CountDooku13

  • I'm not against you in any way, CountDooku. You don't need to apologize. Wookieepedia needs good editors, and I can tell that you are one. However, observations based on sources are not necessarily sources. If something says "Tambor, Mai, and Hill were all friends before the Clone Wars", then it's true. Also, we have plenty of redlinks all over Wookieepedia. They basically serve as signs saying "Create me!", and they should not be removed. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 13:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Administrator

Don't take this the wrong way but you should become an administrator. You seem to like correcting things here. Anakin SoloJedi (Hero to the Enemy)20px 23:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Help

Since Sentry isn't here right now I was wondering if you can help me with this template.

150px| What's this
This article or image is lacking a source.