Welcome, First Emperor of the Global Empire!

Hello, First Emperor of the Global Empire, and welcome to Wookieepedia! We hope you like the place and choose to join us in building the best Star Wars encyclopedia there is. Here are some things you should know:

Wookiees-Transparent

New to wikis? Don't worry, we were all new once. Our help pages will get you started, and the Jundland Wastes sandbox can be used for test edits. Don't be afraid to make mistakes—be bold!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, you can consult our FAQ, ask a question in the Senate Hall forum, visit our official IRC channel, or leave me a message on my talk page.
May the Force be with you! —RattsT (talk) 08:35, July 12, 2020 (UTC)

Warning

You shouldn't be editing other people's user pages. Just a heads up so you don't do it again. Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 13:19, July 22, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Unidentified Dowutin

At the time of deletion, the page continued nothing but "This individual was a Dowutin", which on itself is not notable enough to warrant an article, per years of precedent. If said individual did something notable, then it should be noted in the article itself. 1358 (Talk) 20:10, August 18, 2020 (UTC)

  • It makes sense now. They didn’t even specify which Dowutin it was. Not even a character infobox like;

It's clear to me now. First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 20:30, August 18, 2020 (UTC)

Mass editing

Hey! It comes from practice, once you get the hang of editing you can do things quick! Also all I am doing is adding an appearance to something so its a relatively simple process of going into the appearances box and pasting the appearance haha --Lewisr (talk) 18:08, August 27, 2020 (UTC)

  • Yeah I do have the things open in multiple tabs, it at least speeds the process up --Lewisr (talk) 18:25, August 27, 2020 (UTC)

Zander Freemaker

Hey I saw you added Zander Freemaker to the Freemakers page. I'm just leaving a message to clarify why that got removed. Unlike the other members of the cast, he has not been canonized because he was not mentioned in Droidography. If a source does canonize him, he can be added. Right now he just remains in the behind the scenes section though.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:59, September 11, 2020 (UTC)

  • Literally, none of the Freemakers are really canon. So it makes no difference. Either way, I believe he should be mentioned in the list regardless. First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 20:18, September 11, 2020 (UTC)
    • The ones mentioned in the Droidogrpahy book are though, Zander wasn't so for the moment we shouldn't add him as a canonical member --Lewisr (talk) 20:30, September 11, 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that your edit to Green Leader (Atollon)‎ added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 11:15, September 12, 2020 (UTC)

No Legends notability

Exactly what it says: the subject is not notable in the Legends continuity. SilverSunbird (talk) 17:38, September 15, 2020 (UTC)

  • The subject is not notable in Legends because Iden Versio was created for the new canon. Therefore, she does not have a Legends counterpart. In fact, the TIE pilot you are flagging as Iden's nonexistent Legends counterpart almost certainly already has an article and a different name in Legends. It's not hard to understand. SilverSunbird (talk) 17:44, September 15, 2020 (UTC)

Hi, to clear up the apparent confusion, the character has no notable information within Legends. Just because the character received a name and story in canon doesn't mean they automatically get a Legends page. A subject needs to adhere to our notability policy for each separate continuity. Also, on an unrelated note, I'd advise you change the layout of your talk page. This border bundles up any messages and makes it more difficult to follow a thread of replies. Thank you. RattsT (talk) 02:05, September 16, 2020 (UTC)

  • This was inspired by Tommy-Macaroni's talkheader, but I have no idea how to close it. Anyways, how do all of you even know about my page creation? Are articles pending deletion really so popular? First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 07:47, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
  • Also, I realized you two are both right. Same with the Unidentified Lothalite page I created earlier, it wasn’t notable. First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 07:51, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • I became aware of the page and your conversation with SilverSunbird after noticing it on recent changes and I thought I'd chime in, since it seemed there was confusion. Also, you can close the header by inserting |} into a new line directly below it. RattsT (talk) 08:08, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
      • Off topic, but is it a bot autocreating those “welcome to Wookieepedia” templates at the top or is it user-made? First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 18:27, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
        • If you were to read the whole thing, you would see that the user who added it signed their name at the bottom of the message. In this case, that would be me. The template itself is consistent among users and can be seen here. RattsT (talk) 16:33, September 17, 2020 (UTC)

Continuity

Please note that your edit on Teckla Minnau has been reverted since the image is from the Legends continuity, and thus cannot be used for the Canon article. Thanks. - - -CIS roundel OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 12:29, October 3, 2020 (UTC)

  • Why? It’s literally a promotional image, and no article about a character that has appeared in movies can have a Clone Wars image in the infobox. First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 12:33, October 3, 2020 (UTC)

Civility

Hi First Emperor, I just wanted to give you a heads up about our Civility policy. I wouldn't say you've explicitly broken it yet, but some of your recent comments here, here, and here could easily pass as rude, judgemental, or demeaning. I hope this wasn't your intention but I just wanted to let you know about the policy so you can be more careful in the future. Thank you for your cooperation. Tommy-Macaroni 13:05, October 3, 2020 (UTC)

  • Even though the third one might be a bit rude on second thought, none of them had the intent to be rude. First Emperor of the Global Empire (talk) 13:18, October 3, 2020 (UTC)