Welcome, BobaVett!Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —SFH 22:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC) |
Articles with the "Inuse" template
I suggest you pay attention to what the Inuse template says. Otherwise, if you keep editing articles with that template, your edits will undoubtedly be reverted. Grand Moff Tranner 
(Comlink) 21:03, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
Several things
First off, a warning to remain civil. Edit summaries like "THEY WERE NOT SITH. PERIOD." are not acceptable. Second, another warning, this one regarding the three-revert rule. And third off, regarding your "glitch" that results in the random deletion of words: if this continues to happen, I would ask you to stop editing Wookieepedia until the problem is fixed. None of these things should keep occurring. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 20:32, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Here's another warning for your collection: You were blocked for removing information from the Sith apprentice article. Now you've returned from that block only to continue removing the same information from the article; additionally, you've expanded this to other articles. Either bring your issue up on the appropriate talk page(s) or stop it. If you continue to do what you've been doing, you will be blocked again - only this time, the block will be longer. Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 22:05, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Waiting two seconds and then removing the information doesn't work, either. If you keep this up, you will be in violation of the Three-Revert Rule (again) and will be blocked (again). Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 22:18, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
- Waiting two seconds and then removing the information doesn't work, either. If you keep this up, you will be in violation of the Three-Revert Rule (again) and will be blocked (again). Grand Moff Tranner
- I suggest you review the above warning. Please remain civil in edit summaries, and please stop romving information from pages. Thank you. Jonjedigrandmaster (We seed the stars) 02:50, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
