Talk: Anzati02

Welcome, Anzati02!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: right|180px

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Guri

The photo is taken from the Star Wars Customizable Card Game, the ones signed by the Hildebrandts are from Topps's Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire trading cards and the rest are from the comic Shadows of the Empire: Evolution. For future reference, if you click on an image, most of them say where they came from. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

  • No problem. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
    • That's fine. It's next on my list after Evolution for my expand Guri to make room for more half-naked pictures until it's good enough for FA project. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Re:Lamest Thing

First, welcome to Wookieepedia. Now, the reason you can't vote. I see you registered yesterday. You must be registered for a few days before you can vote for Coolest and Lamest Thing Ever. Just wait a few days (four?) and then you'll be able to vote. The reason it's locked is to prevent anon registering just to vandalize. Chack Jadson 19:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:brains

1. Cannon go boom. 2. If it's canon, then put it in in a form that is grammatically correct, or at least decipherable. tzzA 20:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Cracken

You said: First of all, the Star Wars Figures have been made by hasbro for the last eight or nine years now. Second, It has been comfirmed on star wars.com and on rebelscum.com that the figure is in fact Cracken. Anzati02 18:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Yes, I agree with you. I was in fact suggesting to keep the information on Cracken's article. If you revise Cracken's history {http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Airen_Cracken&diff=prev&oldid=1317088} you will see that Xwing328 removed the speculative info and I suggested {http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Airen_Cracken&diff=1317570&oldid=893786} to keep the information by proving it was not speculation. "I suggest a rewording specifying that it is not speculation" - I did not want an "edit war" on Cracken's article page, only a debate on Cracken's talk page. I did re-wrote your paragraph on the article, correcting a typo ("comfirmed" -> "confirmed") and adding information (There are two "Endor Rebel soldier" toys, a black person and Cracken, plus it is a 2006). Nevertheless, the paragraph was removed by Redemption, basing on the fact that it was more something for the Star Wars Merchandise Wiki. All of this is available on Cracken's history page.

Let's see now your paragraph as I left it after my modifications:

  • It is confirmed that Cracken is one of the Endor Rebel Soldier variations in the 2006 Hasbro SAGA Collection action figure line. (15:18, 3 May)
  • Both the official Star Wars webpage and specialized fansite Rebelscum dot Com confirm that Cracken is one of the Endor Rebel Soldier variations in the 2006 Hasbro SAGA Collection action figure line.

Those paragraphs support the "second" fact you've just said. You and I share the same opinion: The Rebel Endor soldier is Cracken. Official sources have confirmed it. Nevertheless, other wookieepedians seem to believe that this datum is not important enough to be menctioned here. I digress; I consider any merchandise on Expanded Universe important characters should be mentioned.

I am only guilty of a typo in the talk page when I wrote a title saying "Kenner toy" instead of "Hasbro toy". However, I do not consider it a great mistake because it is only an epigraph on the talk page, not "real" information on the article. Talk pages, nevertheless, should not be edited.

I have copied this information both in my user talk page, as an answer to yours, and in your page, so you cannot miss it easily. I hope we can continue this discussion, just to make you see we do not have confronted oppinions.

Greetings,

Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. If this figure has been confirmed to be Airen Cracken, AND if the character contributes anything new to canon, then re-add the appropriate information with proper sources. Otherwise, bring the information about the action figure to the Star Wars Merchandise Wiki. —Xwing328(Talk) 18:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Fanart

The Knowledge Bank thread was deleted, so I assume the image you posted was fanon, though why that would be automatic grounds for deletion is beyond me. However, those chick pictures on your infoboxes are fanart too, right? I just wanted to know where you got all that great artwork. DarthMRN 20:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

They are not fan art. I found them on THIS site. I think it was deleted because it was a Nudge nudge kind of think. And no, the chicks on my page are from this site. I beleive you can find them on the list of advert pages. The twilek picture can be found on the gallery of Twi'lek images. Hope this helps. Anzati02 22:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

  • A canon female stormtrooper?! No way! I gotta get to the bottom of this. DarthMRN 22:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I should have figured that one out. When they allow aliens, they would of course allow females as well. DarthMRN 22:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Bow

Yeah, I noticed that some time after changing stuff. I thought I had cleaned up my mess, but it appears not =P Stake black msg 22:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks for the welcome

thank you for the welcome, it's always nice to feel like you belong. Do you mean exact birthdate, as in the same year? if so, that is cool. I've already improved Bubo's page and Ephant Mon's, though I won't be able to contribute too much just yet,as i've only just buying star wars books and comics a month or so ago. I'll post some pictures of my comic in the next week or so. thanks once again for the welcome. AdmirableAckbar 09:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

comics

theres a sci-fi shop near where i live(Ireland) which stocks the Clone Wars comics & the knights of the old republic comics, but they cost €20 ($26). i can also get them from www.amazon.co.uk for between €10-€15($13-$19)(including postage to REPUBLIC OF IRELAND), but other than that, theres not many other places (bar ebay). i think there is an www.amazon.com based in America. hope that'll be of help (or www.amazon.anzat if you really are an anzati) AdmirableAckbar 18:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

  • i found a website, which seems to contain all the republic comics - every single page. I know its better to have them in your hands, but i thought you might find this useful. The site is www.swtimeline.ru. Don't panic when you see all the russian text, just type in the name of the comic on the search box, and viola. Have fun! AdmirableAckbar 22:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

ephant Mon

hey, if you get a chance would you look at Ephant Mon's article. I'm trying to get it nominated for FA status. If you think it's good enough, could you sign your name in the support section of the featured articles nomination page. thanks AdmirableAckbar 23:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles

  • Provide a canon source for the creation of article such as brassiere or underpants (and I mean where the text calls it that) or it will be deleted. For all we know, those items in the GFFA may be called something completely different, say example "the flibbitygibbet". :-P Nevertheless, ignoring this warning will result in a block. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 02:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
    • It's not called that in KotOR II- I just checked the entire dialogue file for "brassiere" and "underpants". I doubt it's in KotOR I. Could you be a little more specific? Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 02:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
      • And when you create an article, you need to list the exact appearance anyway, or it will be deleted. Read the WP:MOS and you'll see what I'm talking about. Our articles are not explicitly canon sources, so you will need more proof than saying "I saw it in a Wookieepedia article". Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 02:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Uh, I removed them from the article because they don't seem to be canon. That type of article shouldn't be created unless you have a specific reference. From what you've told me, you don't. The dialogue files are in the game's directory, btw. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 02:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
    • My intention was not to "chew you out" or be rude to you. I just wanted to get the point across that you shouldn't make articles a) without appearances section and b) don't always trust what our articles say without canonical proof. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 03:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks for bringing that to my attention, I left Azizlight a question about it on his talk page. As far as the word "underwear" being in the game, it is in the dialogue, and it is in the dialogue files, which has basically all the text displayed on items, dialogue options, and ingame notices, etc. I don't have it online- it was pulled from the game itself, and for me to upload it would likely be a violation of copyright laws. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 03:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Ordinarily, I would, but RL complications mean that I don't have the game with me atm. You can look for a dialog.tlk file in your copy of KotOR II (PC only) and then pull up the notepad file with all the dialog in it. It's not organized at all, but a keyword search should get you what you need, provided you can find it. Atarumaster88 20px (Talk page) 17:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Underwear

Stop putting in boxer shorts and brassiers. Those specific articles of clothing are real world things that aren't mentioned in any canon source, so putting them in is OOU. -- SFH 00:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Due to your blatant disregard of SFH's warning, I reverted your most recent edits and locked the article in question until further notice. Cheers, Greyman(Paratus) 00:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
    • That was my mistake. I was made aware of it in IRC and I acted on that. I have no problem correcting a mistake of mine, but, FYI, don't come onto my talk page and threaten me by saying that the going-on's of Wookieepedia are not my business. Greyman(Paratus) 00:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
      • Did you read my above msg before posting that on my talk page?? It was my mistake through IRC. Understood? It will be corrected. I apologise. Greyman(Paratus) 00:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
        • I am an Admin...just like Atarumaster88 and SFH. You must not be understanding what happened, so let me lay it out for you: I was speaking with some guys on Wookieepedia's chat channel, called IRC. On there, this whole Underwear debacle was brought to my attention. I reacted on the word that the page had been vandalised. I was wrong. Do you understand now? Because it was pretty clear in the two posts before this. I corrected my mistake, unlocked Underwear, and am now leaving you this msg to make it painfully clear of the fact. Cheers, Greyman(Paratus) 00:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

A'Sharad Hett

No. He's 184 years old. He was born 47 BBY, and the Legacy comics take place in 137 ABY, my friend. Check your years next time. Victor (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)