Welcome, Alucard10001!Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask one of our administrators. May the Force be with you! |
Warning
Please do not remove content from Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OLIOSTER (talk) 03:54, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
Darth Caedus
Darth Caedus is a Featured Article. Any additions to it must be sourced properly, lest it run the risk of losing its status. Please follow the sourcing policy. NaruHina Talk
11:35, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
NPOV
Please be sure that all of your edits comply with our neutral point of view policy, as nearly all of your edits so far have failed this policy and also ignored our sourcing policies. You have continuously attempted to alter and/or remove content to make your favorite characters appear better, and such blatant NPOV violations are not accepted here on Wookieepedia. Please take this into consideration, as further violations can result in administrative action. Thank you. Cade Calrayn 20:15, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
- While that is partially correct (mostly just about the lack of sourcing because I didn't used to have at-my-fingertips access to a lot of the reference material, my bad), I seem to recall that the primary incident you seem to be referring to is my edits on Palpatine's page way back when, all concerning the fact that he is recognized as the most powerful Sith Lord in SW in multiple canon sources. There was some Vitiate fan/fans who misinterpreted a number of canon statements involving the fact that Vitiate was the most powerful Sith Lord who had lived up to that point, so I continually edited that particular page whenever I found that it had been altered. I even added multiple sources to back up my assertion, sources that were ignored by said Vitiate fan/fans until those exact same sources were used to justify the exact same claim by the user MasterOfEnlightenment, at which point both the claim and the sources were incorporated into the article and have not been removed since. I simply didn't write out the sort of eloquent explanation that he presented in the Palpatine talk page because I thought it was so obvious that it didn't require such an explanation, especially with, what was it, somewhere in the area of six official sources referenced. Whoops. Furthermore, I don't particularly like Palpatine's character at all. Alucard10001 (talk) 14:43, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Galactic Empire edits
While your edit to Galactic Empire is appreciated, the page currently has a template called {{Inuse}} at the top. This template means that someone is currently working on improving the article, and to avoid edit conflicts, no one other than the placer of the template should edit the page while the message is visible. Thank you for your cooperation. —GethralkinHyperwave 22:42, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Please provide sources when adding information
Hi Alucard10001. Thank you for your edit to Galactic Empire. However, it is important to provide good sourcing when adding information to articles. Otherwise your additions may be removed.--Richterbelmont10 (come in R2!) 03:50, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
reverted edits
I reverted the edits because you didn't source them. You appear to have valid sources for your edits, but you will need to source them. See this page to properly add information to the article. Thanks. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:09, November 19, 2014 (UTC)
