Retcon and missing sources
- Unfortunately didn't take a look at this till after it had passed nomination, but the way this article uses retcon is inconsistent with how the template is used across a large number of other status articles. Retcon is only used when two subjects that previously existed independently from separate sources are clarified to be the same subject by a later source. That hasn't happened here though as the concept of wedding fabric didn't exist prior to it being identified as the veil, this is just a previously unnamed subject receiving a name in a later source, the same situation as a huge number of film status articles that just use 1stID. See Beytolim, Toos, Ianad Cisma, etc. The BTS should also be rewritten to start with the first appearance in the film then move onto the later identification for consistency. The article also seems to be missing a lot of sources that depict Padme wearing the veil during AOTC unless I'm missing something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)