A good reference
Looks like a good Refrence...Narnian 15:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Pictures?
- I'm so excited for this. I know its an Encyclopedia but will it have picuters? (not alot of course). Thanks. JediNTT307 01:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- As long as the book contains new information on unnamed characters, etc..., I'll be happy. --Sompeetalay 07:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- So... Did that picture of Darth Vectivus come from The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia? Do you suppose the Encyclopedia might put in images of characters that have no canon image? JediNTT307 23:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- As long as the book contains new information on unnamed characters, etc..., I'll be happy. --Sompeetalay 07:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Major Palpatine Revelation?
I read here (same page, 3 posts down) that Plagueis may have created Palpatine to be the ultimate vessel for The Force. http://boards.theforce.net/literature/b10003/29515258/p19 71.231.130.121 03:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
It was Anakin. --Fisto Games 07:17, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
Rex?
Does it say if Rex is a arc or not in it?Sith-venator 00:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Faults
Did anyone else notice errors in this collection. Such as the article on Galen Marek states that he was overcome by the combined forces of Palpatine of Vader and that his power was no match for theirs' despite the fact that Galen bested both of them in combat. Also the article on Revan doesn't mention the fact that her was building the Sith forces up and attacking the Republic only where it was weak to prepare it for when the real Sith would soon strike, but Malak's betrayal put an end to those plans. In addition on the article on Jaden (Kyle Katarn's apprentice from Jedi Academy) they reffer to the death of Rosh Penin when in fact he was not killed by Alora. (To name just a few)
Ryan Fett (For Mandalore!) 00:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, when was an encyclopaedia ever 100% accurate. It's inevitable with a collection of articles that huge that some errors will slip through to publication. — beeurd talk 21:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- there are many factual errors with the legacy of the force era. Steves490 21:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Other entries
Entries only mentioned inside other entries, what to do about them? VT-16 20:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't list them in this article: it might get too long. —Silly Dan (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- It is already too long. I suggest using scroll boxes for each separate letter. Mauser 14:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree and will implement it in a moment. As to entries mentioned only inside entries, still list CSWE on the respective pages, but mark next to the source (Under Nim Drovis) as applicable. --Eyrezer 08:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- It is already too long. I suggest using scroll boxes for each separate letter. Mauser 14:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Contents
Are you listing every article that appears in it? Sounds like a mammoth list. If so, do we want to do the same for Star_Wars_Encyclopedia? I have that one and I'm sure I could find time. — beeurd talk 21:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- The "Contents" should just be the main article entries. If we have an "Appearances" section, that would list literally everything in the books. —Xwing328(Talk) 03:39, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it is only the main article entries. If you're interested, you can check out WookieeProject Star Wars Encyclopedia. It's for both the SWE and CSWE. Cylka-talk- 03:51, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Incomplete
Are some whole sections, such as N and O, meant to be incomplete on this article? If not, I can provide it. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 18:04, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
Never mind, I see it now. Stupid me didn't scroll through the other talk sections... LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 18:05, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
I've got the same question, can't even find how to "scroll through the other talk sections", haven't even a clue how to properly ask a question here —Unsigned comment by 78.21.218.143 (talk • contribs)
- I don't know what he is talking about, but yes, it does seem that the sections are incomplete. Cade
Calrayn 17:25, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
- I can find the time to do so, though it would take some time. I will, if it is alright with others. LIGHTNING12345678910 (talk) 00:50, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
Split up?
Anyone else in favor for splitting this article up into volumes? The page takes a while to load up. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:34, October 13, 2013 (UTC)