Talk: Talhovi

This is the talk page for the article "Talhovi." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Talhovi has been listed as a Good article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved in line with Wookieepedia's policies, please feel free to contribute.

"Galaxy upon galaxy. Vast, unexplored realms of space. It is a wild, untamed universe we live in." Talhovi is within the scope of WookieeProject Astrography, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles on the various astrographic entities of the galaxy, such as stars, planets, sectors, and hyperlanes. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Grid placement

Why is L-18 being considered an error when it's in the most recent sources? K-18 is the error. - TLM⁸⁶ 21:51, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

• Latest source is a factor, but is not the only factor. Here, and on other astrographical articles that I have written up and successfully brought to status, I give precedence to what maps show us, instead of what non-graphical lists tell us. And while we're here, going forward please refrain from 1) making significant changes to a status article without consulting its original nominator where possible, and 2) reverting said nominator's edits, again without consulting them first. Imperators II^(Talk) 23:42, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
  • So why do you give precedence to maps, then? Graphical maps can't possibly contain errors that non-graphical lists subsequently and consistently correct? If so, there's plenty of other articles that need changing to obey mistakes on maps. - TLM⁸⁶ 21:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
    • Of course maps can contain errors. What I am saying is that, in cases where there are no other significant reasons to believe that a map is in error, it makes more sense to me to defer to what a map tells us because it relays a more interconnected chunk of Star Wars lore than any single Appendix/Online Companion grid square entry. And when I say "other significant reasons," to me the fact that the Online Companion was released after the Atlas isn't necessarily one. It's not like the Online Companion hasn't contained a number of errors over time. Imperators II^(Talk) 08:13, 16 December 2025 (UTC)