Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Sith Warrior (Galen Marek)."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

TFU logo

Sith Warrior (Galen Marek) is within the scope of WookieeProject The Force Unleashed, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating from The Force Unleashed.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

LucasArtsLogo

Sith Warrior (Galen Marek) is within the scope of WookieeProject Video Games, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating from any Star Wars video games.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
March 5, 2010 Article has undergone Trash compactor No consensus
Current status: Article kept after Trash compactor

Mujomba

This isn't an actual person; it's like the Darth Vader that Luke faced in the cave on Dagobah. Besides, the whole thing was just a vision. So, should this article be deleted? Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 23:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Dark Spirit: We have an article on that too, it was a vision also. DjMack 23:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
    • Not really. Luke really fought the Dark Spirit; this "being" was just a vision in a vision. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 23:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Acctualy, from what I gather, the "sith warior" is a traning module that the Master Holocron made by using the force to see into a possible future.--Lord starkiller the strong 00:36, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Is this a real event in star wars history?

Is there a real dual between Galen Marek and his darker half or is this simply a non-canon download? -Bron Handa 00:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

  • I am under the impression that Wookieepedia is treating this level as we would an expansion pack for another game. That is, it is considered a canon event for the time being. The only problem, continuity-wise, that I see is exactly when this event took place. -MPK 02:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

It could be between the Imperial Raxus and Death Star levels, as these are the only two that don't follow on from each other, in terms of costumes and events. User talk:1705jallen

IMO

I regards to the above statements I would like to add my own opinion on the subject. Wether this person is real or not that is hard to say. This individual has appeared in three separate sources and all three sources are different. In PS2 version of the game the appearance of this character was already apart of the game's plot. In the PS3 version his appearance was in a downloadable add-on. And then there was the appearance in the novel. In the PS3 version I'm skeptical, given the area where this battle took place within the Jedi Temple I don't think he is real. The chamber where this battle took place was near a Jedi Padwan Training Chamber. Who is to say that this wasn't all fake that it wasn't apart of some generic Jedi Trail. All this could have happened in a Jedi Trials chamber and that this is something all Padwans must face before become a true Jedi Knight. Kento Marek even said in at the start that before Galen could be a Jedi he had to pass the Jedi Trials of the Mind and the mission was even called the Trials of the Mind and your objective is to pass it. With that being said I'd be more likely to believe that the Sith Warrior was just a hologram like Darth Desolous and Darth Phobos all of this could also apply to the PS2 version as well, though it is less likely the Jedi Council would want Padwans taking the trials in their chamber and that is where the battle takes place in the PS2 version... With all that said here is my true opinion on the matter. This page should be completely re-written and here is why. The PS2/Wii/PSP version and Xbox/PS3 version are so completely different that neither one should remain or be considered canon. On this page itself it states, "Galen also wore this armor in a vision where he killed his father in the novel, the appearance in the novel effectively brought the Sith Stalker into actual canon." EXACTLY The vision where the armor is canon should be the vision that should be on this page not the games. So this page should re-written to retell the event where Galen fought the Sith Warrior on Kashyyk and not in the Jedi Temple on Coruscant. Furthermore, in that event he was a vision and not a hologram which would make him real. Apotheoses Jedi 02:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC-6)

He's Lord Starkiller!

I edited this page and revealed his true name, Lord Starkiller, as was revealed in the Tatooine DLC, and it took me quite a long time to do it all, then it all got deleted and i got told that i was doing fanon. how is it fanon? It's in the new DLC, and sure it's an infinities story, but it's still canon in that universe. I would like this page changed to fit the new information that is out.--DK743 19:40, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

  • Because he appears in Jedi Temple in the canonical storyline. Everything that is non-canon belongs to the behind the scenes section. MauserComlink 19:50, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
    • well could his name at least be changed to Lord Starkiller, which is his proper name.--DK743 20:35, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
      • Uhm, no. This article is about canonical vision found in the Jedi Temple. Information about the non-canonical storyline can already be found in Galen Marek#Alternate ending. MauserComlink 20:46, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Title

Alright, Lord Starkiller gets redirected to Galen Marek. Still, Sith Warrior isn't his proper name. Rather, if you look at his health bar during the fight, it labels him "Dark Apprentice". Shouldn't that be the article's title? And we can even still keep it like: Dark Apprentice (Galen Marek). --Mateo22 20:52, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Opinion, anyone? --Mateo22 Seperatist leadershipContact 18:24, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Dark Links

There are several outside links at the end of the page in the Behind the Scenes section. They are all incorrect and will not follow. The error is in using the | to separate the link from the name used in the text. The | appears as part of the actual link and prevents it from following correctly. I cannot figure out how to fix these. Help would be appreciated. --DKong 19:18, October 24, 2009 (UTC)

  • Whoever put them there used actual url's not the interwiki code like [[w:c:zelda:dark link|Dark Link]]. I fixed them though. Also does anyone have any objections to me changing "Dark Samus from the Metroid series" to "Dark Samus from the Metroid series' Metroid Prime Trilogy"? As that description is a little more accurate as she only appears in those three games.--Kahn Iceay 09:11, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I wanted to fix those, but I didn't know how to link outside the wiki. Also I think that's a good idea to be more specific. --DKong 22:15, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
      • Not a problem, for future reference its [[w:c:nameofwiki:nameofarticle|howyouwantthelinktoappear]] so an example would be [[w:c:metroid:Metroid Prime Trilogy|Metroid Prime Trilogy]] and you get Metroid Prime Trilogy. And I'll alter the page to be more specific about Dark Samus more encyclopedic that way I think.--Kahn Iceay 04:33, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
      • Does anyone actually have a source for that game informer though? Or for the rest of the article? I played the PS2 version of the game, this guy wasn't in it. And while I don't mind editing the links to be more specific about Dark Samus I don't wanna go claiming that as truth without proof. And I cant find anything other then this which isn't exactly a verifiable source.--Kahn Iceay 04:47, November 25, 2009 (UTC)