Fate
If the details in this blog post are considered canon, then Shaak Ti (along with Coleman Kcaj) died during Order 66 (http://www.starwars.com/news/the-jedi-council-meet-the-masters). Ressor (talk) 20:32, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if we can consider this canon, due to the fact that they use Legends information all throughout the article, with a couple of the sources being Legends and the use of BBY in the article. Cevan (talk) 20:44, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
Yes, if Legends info is used then that should discredit it. Skywalker2255 (talk) 20:53, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Blogs like the one that Ressor linked to are fan-generated, and are not written by anyone at Lucasfilm. As such, they cover the entire franchise without distinguishing between Canon or Legends. Aka, per Cevan. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 21:40, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
First, the deleted scenes are not considered canon. There shouldn't be a reference to Shaak Ti dying during that scene.
Next, regardless, the CW Destiny vision referenced by this page, was originally intended to correlate to that event, but the vision itself doesn't depict any outcome unequivocally. We never see Shaak Ti's attacker and the vision does not confirm her death at all. The vision only confirms that at some point she's impaled by a blue saber. Future writers could easily make her survive it and the attacker could be anyone at all who picked up a blue saber.
The entry needs to reflect the actual information without any speculation or reference to non-canon events.—Unsigned comment by Yca-ca (talk • contribs)
- Since when does anyone survive being impaled by a lightsaber? It's never happened at any time in Canon media. I think it's safe to assume that, like the other events in Yoda's vision, this actually happened and she died. Not everybody can pull a Darth Maul. Shayn Mikel (talk) 18:00, July 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Yoda's vision holds inaccuracies. Many jedi are depicted charging clone troopers, including Obi wan and Mace Windu, who obviously weren't present at such an event. Shaak Ti being killed by the blue lightsaber is a force vision, potentially of the future, but always in motion the future is.
Saying a force vision or deleted scene is enough to presume canon is a slippery slope. The events in Volume 2 of the Clone Wars micro series seemlessly lead directly into the first act of Revenge of the Sith, so it could be said Shaak Ti survived as per that series if we really held a light up to potential canon. In true canon her fate is still yet to be determined. Captain Quazar (talk) 15:31, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
Star Wars 9: Showdown on the Smuggler's Moon, Part II
Luke stumbles upon various Holocrons in Star Wars 9. Is it worth acknowledging that while the Togruta Jedi in one of the Holocrons was not identified, it seems obvious based on the Jedi's appearance and what was said by the Jedi, that it was intended to be Shaak Ti? Perhaps something should be mentioned in the Behind the Scenes section at least? --111.69.150.43
Death
People seem to have forgotten Shaak Tis defeat at the hand of Darth Vaders secret apprentice Starkiller. I know that people are debating whether or not the Force Unleashed is canon or not but considering that the Force Unleashed fits perfectly into the canon and that George Lucas wrote it back before Disney bought Star Wars and that no information from Star Wars Legends was used I think it is safe to assume that the Force Unleashed is still canon and that Shaak Ti dies at the hands of Star Killer.--79.97.63.82 15:44, December 24, 2015 (UTC)Star Wats Fan
- It's not canon. Lucasfilm explicitly stated in their original Legends announcement that the only stories from before April 25, 2014 that are canon are Episodes I-VI and The Clone Wars. The Force Unleashed is not canon—Star Wars Rebels tells the official story of how the Rebel Alliance was formed. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 15:55, December 24, 2015 (UTC)
Shaak Ti's death should canonically be the deleted scene where she gets killed by Grievous. It is in the special features disc and though it is a deleted scene, deleted scenes are considered canon. It should not be the FAN-MADE death where she gets killed by Anakin. —Unsigned comment by 71.10.91.46 (talk • contribs)
- Quite an assumption there. For all we know Shaak Ti could pop up in Rebels. --Alientraveller (talk) 18:22, January 20, 2016 (UTC)
It can't be the scene where Grievous kills her, she appears later in a small hologram of a council meeting in Revenge of the Sith, way after the events of the ship. Her appearance is something nearly everyone oversees and it drives me crazy. I think its after Grievous dies too. I think it'd be cool if they have her be the only other survivor of the Jedi council, plus she's female so that'd be even cooler. And last but not least, Deleted scenes are not considered canon. —Unsigned comment by Thudbug (talk • contribs) 19:12, January 28, 2016 (UCT)
Shaak Ti has no canon death. Everything that established her death was declared non-canon or is not definitive in result or circumstances. Video Games and deleted scenes are not canon. The canon scene from Yoda's Clone Wars vision does not definitively show the outcome of the saber attack, when it occurred, or who the attacker was. She could have easily survived the attack, or the attack could have been a possible outcome that was prevented by actions leading up to that moment etc.—Unsigned comment by Yca-ca (talk • contribs)
Oxford commas for Togruta skin colors?
I'm just wondering: I just reverted this page back to having an Oxford Comma in the infobox, and now I'm wondering: What's Wookieepedia's verdict on such commas? I've always found that they're useful to differentiate between a list of three vs. a list of two with a person addressed in the beginning Examples: "Bob, Joe and I are fully capable" Is this someone telling Bob that the speaker and Joe are capable, or someone telling someone else that all three people are capable? Just a question I've been wondering about... Geek'ari (talk) 22:44, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
- Wookieepedia doesn't have any definitive statement regarding Oxford commas. I prefer to use them to avoid confusion, but, technically, they aren't necessary. It's up to the writer. Cwedin(talk) 22:51, February 20, 2016 (UTC)
Montral and Lekku stripes
Who agrees that Shaak Ti's montral and lekku stripes are more of a gray than a blue compared to the likes of Ahsoka Tano? If you wanted a live action example, look at Ashla's montral/lekku stripes and compare the colors. I'd say that whereas Ahsoka and Ashla's montrals and lekku are white and blue, Shaak Ti's are white and gray. --Kyle03 (talk) 19:17, February 22, 2016 (UTC)
Fate confirmed
The preview of Star Wars: Galactic Atlas confirms that she was killed by Darth Vader in the Jedi Temple. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:43, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
This contradicts the canon Star Wars comic which has her at a different temple aware of Order 66 happening.
- That is not necessarily Shaak Ti Overlordjeff (talk) 21:01, July 18, 2016 (UTC)
Yes, and it isn't just a Togruta female it is Shaak-ti, the markings and jewelry are identical, not similar, identical, and the way the reveal is framed it is clear we are supposed to recognize the character. It's also in-universe narrative, as opposed Galactic Atlas which is an out of universe sourcebook which are known to make mistakes from time to time, like the mistake made about Luminara Unduli being a jedi council member, on the same page of the atlas sourcebook her fate is stated. —Unsigned comment by Colin1993 (talk • contribs)
- Please, let's not do that again. If you look at the article's references, you'll see that Pablo Hidalgo has confirmed Shaak Ti recorded that holocron the night the temple was under siege. That means there's no contradiction: yes, she did die when Anakin raided the Temple, and yes, it's her holocron. --Lelal Mekha
(Audience Room) 09:50, April 16, 2017 (UTC)
Shaak Ti in SW comic 09
Hi guys after I saw that Shaak Ti was killed in the Jedi Temple and she appeared at the star wars comic I asked Pablo Hidalgo and here is the answer https://twitter.com/pablohidalgo/status/797563070717378560 This confirms that Shaak Ti is the person in the holocron --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:19, November 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for getting that information! I've added it to the appropriate pages --Lewisr (talk) 22:24, November 12, 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, glad I could help --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:05, November 12, 2016 (UTC)
speculation/unverified info- ti's fate
There is a problem at present with the Shaak Ti page where improvements are being overriden with mistakes, by Omicron and Lewisr. they state the vision yoda has of Shaak Ti's death being by Anakin's hand, with Anakin's lightsaber. Both of you and others take note, this is speculatory, this is unverified. It is just a blue lightsaber- that's it, we don't see the owner or the hilt of the lightsaber, we don't even know if Ti was meditating in the vision, we simply see her stabbed with a blue blade! you may want to think about that before deleting my edits next time. The other problem, Shaak Ti is stated to have been killed while meditating by being stabbed in the back- again, this is speculatory, unverified, we do not know the details of how she died- do we? just that she presumably died at the jedi temple at the hands of darth vader. No other details were provided in the sourcebook. A sourcebook, that also claims Luminara Unduli was a jedi council member (she was not), so that source is unreliable. The exact details of her death are unexplained. For you to keep basing the details on a deleted scene from 2005 and claiming it as canon without any canon source is intellectually dishonest and it must stop. It is the best course of action to simply say that a) Yoda's vision was of her being stabbed with a blue lightsaber blade and b) Shaak ti presumably perished at the hands of darth vader during operation knightfall or whatever you want to call it. Nobody knows the finer details of that event, that has not been canonically explained so editors should steer away from attempting to. And no, don't start going off with what a team member said in a tweet as absolute fact and paint the whole picture from there, you need proper, published sources and right now they're lacklustre.
- Its stated in the Galactic Atlas (which is a canon source) that she was killed by Anakin during the attack of the Jedi Temple whilst meditating --Lewisr (talk) 19:56, May 3, 2017 (UTC)
This is not a reliable source because it also stated inaccurate information about luminara unduli user:colin1993
- Mistakes happen from time to time, that doesn't make the book less reliable --Lewisr (talk) 20:03, May 3, 2017 (UTC)
Star Wars 9 again
Now with the not using tweets as canon sources policy and the fact we can't screenshot the tweet from Pablo as its deleted, it appears we're back to the question as too whether we keep the appearance in the holocron or we're assuming its a random Togruta until another source confirms its Shaak Ti --Lewisr (talk) 03:02, June 22, 2018 (UTC)
Shaak Ti's Height
Two cards from the 2015 Topps Star Wars Chrome Perspectives: Jedi vs. Sith set list her height as 1.78 meters, but her Databank entry and Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Character Encyclopedia - Join the Battle! correctly list her height as 1.87 meters.
I am pretty sure it's 1.87 with horns and 1.78 without horns. --GradoNite (talk) 03:20, December 6, 2025 (UTC)