Is JangFett out, or what?
Y'know, User:JangFett hasn't really done anything since he put up that under construction template. Should we ask him for permission to remove it? If he doesn't respond in a given amount of days, we should remove it anyway, as that would indicate that he is probably inactive, and therefore unlikely to finish it anytime soon. User: Dr. Anonymous1 22:03, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Please have patience. Because I am busy, I currently do not have enough time to work on the article. The article will be completed once I have enough time. Thanks, JangFett (Talk) 00:03, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Then it's not actively undergoing a major edit, is it? -- I need a name (Complain here) 19:08, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Can the page protection be removed, at least? It's pretty clear that there's not going to be any progress on this any time soon, and it's kind of pointless to not let other people make improvements. I'd like to start work on little cleanups-- "court martial" instead of "court martial", stuff like that.--Treesloth (talk) 21:11, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- The protection had already been removed. Jang's working on it on his workbench. Feel free to edit. 501st dogma(talk) 21:16, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- I get this message: "This page has been protected to prevent editing." Also, there is only a "View Source" option, not "Edit".--Treesloth (talk) 23:28, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- You're not autoconfirmed. Wait a few days. Ping-Pong's dead, he's not going anywhere. And besides, "court martial" is the same thing as "court martial". Cade Calrayn
23:44, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- You're not autoconfirmed. Wait a few days. Ping-Pong's dead, he's not going anywhere. And besides, "court martial" is the same thing as "court martial". Cade Calrayn
- I get this message: "This page has been protected to prevent editing." Also, there is only a "View Source" option, not "Edit".--Treesloth (talk) 23:28, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- The protection had already been removed. Jang's working on it on his workbench. Feel free to edit. 501st dogma(talk) 21:16, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- This definitely needs a major overhaul. If you don't have the time, allow someone else to step in and do it, please. Either way, I look forward to more information on this monster. 71.232.190.158 23:43, July 1, 2012 (UTC)Darth Stroya
Dark Jedi
Considering the fact that if Krell had survived he would have became an acolyte to Dooku, would the Dark Jedi infobox be more appropriate? Or is is best as is? --The Lampshade... (talk) 00:20, August 6, 2012 (UTC)Lamp774
How 2 dual-wield double-bladed lightsabers?
I'm really confused, because wouldn't he be chopping off his own arms? Shadowblade777 (talk) 05:02, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Please heed the notice at the very top of the talk page. - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 05:04, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Oh... Then where am I supposed to ask this? Shadowblade777 (talk) 05:09, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
- A better place would be the knowledge bank, you can find it under the forums tab at the top of the page. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:10, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
Legends or Canon?
Why is this page marked as Legends? Isn't TCW show considered canon? 104.35.7.43 05:37, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Everything from TCW is considered both Legends and Canon. This is the Legends version of the article. Trip391 (talk) 05:40, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
- To clarify, so it's as clear as possible, Wookieepedia considers Legends to be a continuity, and considers The Clone Wars to be Legends as well as Canon. Although The Clone Wars is official canon and therefore not part of the official Legends brand (which refers to the formerly-named Expanded Universe), the show's inclusion in Legends material on Wookieepedia is necessary in order to fully document the Legends Clone Wars era, as much of the Legends material within that era depends on information from The Clone Wars. Characters from The Clone Wars, for example, will therefore have Canon pages and Legends pages in order to reflect this. As Trip said, this is the Legends page for Pong Krell. A Canon page has yet to be created, but it will be. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 05:45, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
Except the information in CANON and LEGENDS is identical. Unfortunately, the Canon article is bare bones when the information should be the same Riderfan2150 (talk) 22:20, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
- That's because the Canon page hasn't been expanded upon yet. We don't copy and paste information from Legends to Canon, mainly due to the CC-BY-SA license that Wookieepedia operates under. If you'd like to see more information on the canon Pong Krell page, be bold and write it! - Brandon Rhea(talk) 22:45, April 26, 2015 (UTC)
