Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Kueller."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

FA-Former

Kueller is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 4, 2008 Good article nomination Success
July 28, 2008 Good article by Atarumaster88
July 28, 2008 Featured article nomination Success
August 18, 2008 Featured article by Atarumaster88
May 15, 2021 Featured article review Removed
June 26, 2021 Former Featured article
Current status: Former Featured article
WNEGTCtalk

Kueller is within the scope of WookieeProject The New Essential Guide to Characters, a project dedicated to bringing articles on well-known Star Wars individuals to Featured article status.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Picture

I'm sorry, but is that really a picture of Kueller? It looks nothing like what New Rebellion described. --maru (talk) Contribs 04:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Yep, they both are.Although to clarify, the second one has Brakiss standing infront, if that is what has you confused. As for the masked guy, yep, that's canonically him. --Eyrezer 05:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Are you sure the picture with Kueller and Dolph contains Dolph? In The Essential Guide to Planets and Moons, the other person is just labled as a citizen of Almania (I don't remember the exact label since my copy got lost when my brother moved to college, but I don't believe he was labled as Dolph). Unsigned comment by 71.144.83.171 (talk • contribs)
      • As I quite specifically noted in the description of the picture, if you'd care to click it, that individual was said to be Dolph in The Official Star Wars Fact Files. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 22:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • As I'm reading The New Rebellion, it describes his mask as white, skeletal, skin-tight, with deep black eye-holes that do, although rarely, show his eyes. The picture looks nothing like it's described. korydvandyke 23:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I just finished the book and I agree with maru and korydvandyke. The cover art of the novel is much more accurate. There are no descriptions of "big ears" or "horns" on the Hendanyn Death Mask. It was a flexible skull that adhered to the face. The closest image that looks like the description would be the mask and make up used by Frank Langella in the 1987 live-action He-Man film. Dare I say the descriptions are so close to the images from the movie, I would not at all be surprised if Kristine Kathryn Rusch was influenced by the 1987 film. -- Frank V Bonura 02:25, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Human?

Um if he's a human why does he only have three fingers and a thumb on each hand? Unsigned comment by 62.252.0.9 (talk • contribs)

  • Humanoid? Jedi Dude 15:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Or he's wearing gloves to hide his fourth finger. Everybody knows three-fingered guys are more evil. Gonk 03:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
      • Equally it could just be that his fourth finger cannot be seen from the angle. --Eyrezer 04:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
        • Anyone notice that he looks like Emperor Zurg? lol Darth Byss 20:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Kueller

Hello my name is also Kueller and he is one of my favorite characters. That is Kueller in the picture. ~ Kueller

Image again

Please, can't we use the image from Star Wars: Union instead? At least that one doesn't look like a Transformer toy... Evir Daal 09:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree with Evir Daal Unsigned comment by Shreader4 (talk • contribs)
  • What pic is that? I don't remember it but if you can scan it, go ahead. --Eyrezer 05:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Well the pic is now uploaded, but it doesn't strike me as that great, nor infobox material. --Eyrezer 06:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
      • I'll agree it's not great, but better than the current one, which looks like it's straight out of the old He-Man cartoon. I know it's official, but if there's something more, well, serious, then we should use that one instead. And thanks for uploading the pic, BTW, I don't have the equipment to do that myself. Commander Daal Imperial Emblem 12:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
        • The image is absolutely crap, is of a dream Kueller and not the real Kueller, is dark and shows no details. The current infobox image, despite your dislike, displays Kueller very well. It's of higher quality and a better image in general. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
          • The technical quality of the current one is better, I'll agree to that. I still maintain that the Union one gives a better impression of a man who's supposed to be a scary Darksider. But since I seem to be in the minority here, I won't argue about it. And sorry for taking my time answering, my Internet connection isn't what it should be. Commander Daal Imperial Emblem 14:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Dolph

Hey, are there any pictures of Kueller without his mask? Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing (Go Dodgers! Woooo!)Revanchist Sith 02:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

  • The article contains an image of him standing by an unarmored version of himself. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 20:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

SWG

  • Could someone perhaps mention details of his "Picture only" appearance in Star Wars Galaxies, as this presumably isn't canonical --Jinzler 20:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Lightsaber

The image at the end of the article depicts Kueller with a red lightsaber, but in The New Rebellion (the audiobook version, anyway) his lightsaber is described as having a blue blade. Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article to avoid confusion? 64.180.93.200 19:14, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind. I took care of it myself. 64.180.93.200 19:23, October 31, 2009 (UTC)