Forum:TC:Zonama Sekot (entity)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Zonama Sekot (entity)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:11, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Zonama Sekot (entity) (talk - history - links - logs)

This article is not necessary. The fact that Zonama Sekot was setient can be reflected in the article for the planet, because the planet and it's mind were one and the same, not separate things. Admittedly, the planet's article does not currently convey this well, but I'm sure that a P&T section could be justified, given that Zonama Sekot is both a planet AND a character. Regardless, this article is currently unverified and in it's current state, will be deleted within seven days anyway. --Jinzler 19:56, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Jinzler 19:56, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Based on the creator of the article's logic, we should have separate Zonama and Sekot articles. That's just rediculous. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 19:59, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Just because the current planet article doesn't go into details about its personality/sentience doesn't mean that it shouldn't. We don't need another article for this, we just need to expand/update the Zonama Sekot article itself. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 20:01, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:02, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:27, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Master Jonathan (Council Chambers) Friday, February 18, 2011, 23:17 UTC
  7. Agreed. Corellian PremierRobotechAll along the watchtower 00:35, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Yeah, I'm not seeing why information on Sekot cannot be within the actual Zonama Sekot page. -- SFH 00:47, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
  9. CC7567 (talk) 10:03, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
  10. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:46, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
  11. I know, let's make an article for "Anakin Skywalker's body" that reflects his biological lifetime, then separate articles for his own spirit and the manifest spirit of Darth Vader… Graestan(Talk) 04:36, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
  12. Grunny (talk) 05:41, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
  13. Per Graestan. --Promus Kaa(Rebel Merchant) Redstarbird 09:08, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
  14. Graestan has a point here. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:27, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
  15. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 13:47, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
  16. 1358 (Talk) 15:46, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

Keep

Comments