Forum:TC:Zhaboka

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Zhaboka

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was No consensus. Imperators II(Talk) 18:27, July 9, 2017 (UTC)

Contents

  • 1 Zhaboka (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)
  • 2 Delete
  • 3 Keep
  • 4 Discussion

Zhaboka (talk - history - links - logs - delete - protect)

As we know [1], Star Wars in 100 Scenes ia a pre-Story Group book and it's not considered canon. I'm nominating Zhaboka for deletion, because there's no other canon source that mentions it and its only source is the 100 scenes book.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:16, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Delete

  1. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:17, June 23, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Sad to see a status article go --Lewisr (talk) 21:38, June 23, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:58, June 23, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Well, since it has to go, I may as help to give it the sendoff. ProfessorTofty (talk) 04:29, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Cwedin(talk) 04:58, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
  6. Imperators II(Talk) 08:15, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
  7. Exiled Jedi (talk) 01:17, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
  8. Asithol (talk) 09:21, June 28, 2017 (UTC)
  9. 1358 (Talk) 22:31, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

Keep

Discussion

These 100 Scenes-only Canon articles (if there are any more) should all be grouped in a single TC thread with multiple votes. Imperators II(Talk) 08:15, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

  • This one and Affa were the only ones with 100 scenes as their canon source, but there's some articles that are from the movies but their names haven't been revealed in any source besides 100 scenes, should we TC those articles too??--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:18, June 24, 2017 (UTC)