Forum:TC:VT ship classes

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:VT ship classes

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Grunny (talk) 00:04, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

Kuat destroyer (talk - history - links - logs)/Kuat heavy cruiser (talk - history - links - logs)

The source: "All the ones numbered below the twelve-million mark were reserved for KDY's own use, for designing and testing the munitions storage chambers aboard the heavy cruisers and destroyers that were being built for the Imperial fleet."

Once more, a separate class assumed from a very general mention.

Delete

  1. Lord Hydronium 00:58, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  2. VT is crying now. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 01:01, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  3. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 01:36, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Complete speculation/OR. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 02:32, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 03:37, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Grunny (talk) 04:42, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  7. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 04:47, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  8. -- 1358 (Talk) 09:03, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 09:04, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  10. NAYAYEN:TALK 11:59, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
  11. Delete it...--Gmalek (The ability to edit does not make you intelligent) 04:33, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:49, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  13. With fire! Darth Karikawill destroy your planet! 17:57, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Eh. They really are ship classes, but I'm sure there's plenty on destroyers and heavy cruisers elsewhere. Certainly not a designation. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 18:20, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  15. Imperialles 19:49, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  16. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:27, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
  17. Per Tranner. HAHAHAHA! Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:15, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
  18. I'd like to leave a snarky comment here, but I'm out of them. Maybe I'll have one for the next crop of VT fanon to get compacted. jSarek 08:49, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
  19. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 09:05, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
  20. --Loneshark1138 Incom (Comlink Active) 19:47, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Comments

  • There's two similar ones to these, KDY light cruiser and Imperial Star Battlecruiser, that I decided not to put on the chopping block. Reason why is, unlike the quoted item, these actually appear in the works as specific ships of an unknown class, which I think has better cause for an article than the vagueness above. Of course, they'd be better as individual ship articles, and they have sourcing problems of their own that are common to this type of article, but those are {{sofixit}} issues, rather than TC. - Lord Hydronium 00:58, June 29, 2010 (UTC)