Forum:TC:Unidentified police probe (Coruscant market)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. 1358 ^(Talk) 14:10, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified police probe (Coruscant market) (talk - history - links - logs)

While I'll vote to keep many "Unidentified" things that have been up for TC recently, this is not one of them. Completely non-remarkable from any other police probe seen in any other episode, it does nothing but hover in the background, it has no dialogue. This does not warranty an article. I would have CSD'd it, but I didn't want anyone crying "foul!" over it. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:48, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Vote

Delete

1. JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:48, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. :3 JangFett ^(Talk) 04:50, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. Menkooroo (talk) 04:55, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
4. LelalMekha (talk) 09:17, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
5. Cade Calrayn 15:01, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
6. Why does this article exist in the first place? 501st dogma^(talk) 15:02, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
   • Because it is specifically mentioned in a GA. —MJ— ^{Training Room} Saturday, August 11, 2012, 19:12 UTC
7. —MJ— ^{Training Room} Saturday, August 11, 2012, 19:12 UTC
8. Flargleblarglegargle. And so forth. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:20, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
9. —Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 19:27, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
10. Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 19:31, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
11. *squints* That's a police droid? NaruHina ^Talk 19:56, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
12. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:59, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
13. Background object. Corellian Premier^{All along the watchtower} 20:51, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
14. So much bureaucracy! DD97^{Which bear is best?} 05:59, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
15. Finally, a droid from The Clone Wars we can all agree to delete! Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 12:48, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
16. Bahumbug! MasterFred^(Whatever) 13:32, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
17. Cumulonimbus Cloud ^{(ℳeeting ℛoom)} 15:42, August 12, 2012 (UTC)

Keep

Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 19:17, August 11, 2012 (UTC) (Vote changed as my concern was addressed. Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 19:31, August 11, 2012 (UTC))

Comments

No third options please, because, seriously, what third option could there be? - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 04:48, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

• Just as a clarification note: I created the article because while nominating police droid for CA, the following objection was given by SavageBob: The specific individual units that are featured in those two episodes need articles, since unique droids are treated as unique individuals on the Wook. Hence this article on the unidentified droid. The police droid article later was approved for GA and no objection was raised about the unidentified article being unnecessary. Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 19:17, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nothing wrong with that. But community consensus in this circumstance would effectively overrule that objection. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:20, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • And if that's the consensus, then that's ok. As long as that by removing the link from the police droid article, it does not have its GA status put up for review, I'm good with deleting this article. Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 19:25, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
      • That would not be grounds for status removal, so no worries. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:32, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
        • Cool. :) Coruscantfan ^(Talk) 19:39, August 11, 2012 (UTC)