Forum:TC:Unidentified Rebel Honor Guard (gloves)

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Unidentified Rebel Honor Guard (gloves)
This page is an archive of the Trash compactor discussion about the future of Wookieepedia's coverage of the topic(s) listed below, including whether or not to delete or redirect the relevant page(s). This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the relevant talk pages or in the Senate Hall forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:08, August 27, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Rebel Honor Guard (gloves) (history - links - logs - delete - protect)

I question the notability of this character, who is only pictured in his two sources as a generic placeholder and nothing else. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:04, August 20, 2014 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:04, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. He wasn't even in the Rebellion Era Campaign Guide that I could see.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:16, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
    • I definitely saw the exact artwork used previously in that book before later being reused for the card IIRC, and looked back to verify that I indeed added that to the sources. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:51, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  3. <- Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 19:17, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Trip391 (talk) 19:20, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 19:23, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Every grunt could pull guard duty. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 19:55, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  7. 501st dogma(talk) 19:59, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  8. Supreme Emperor (talk) 01:02, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Agree this should be deleted, and I want to point out that this is a nice example of why I'm nearly convinced a set of general notability rules is impossible to define. One of the things we as a wiki seem to generally agree upon is that a subject that appears in more than one appearance/source is sufficiently notable, but this is an obvious exception to the rule, so what's the point of codifying something that isn't perfectly cut and dry? It seems to me case-by-case is the only practical way to determine this stuff. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:53, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  10. Another one bites the dust praguepride (Talk) 20:28, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  11. 1358 (Talk) 22:06, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  12. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:00, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

Discussion